Friday, March 29, 2024
spot_img

SC puts off hearing CAA cases

Date:

Share post:

spot_img
spot_img

The Supreme Court has refused to stay the execution of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and has also put off hearing a batch of 144 CAA cases challenging the constitutionality of the Act without first hearing the Central Government. Advocate General KK Venugopal said the Government has been served copies of only 60 of the 144 petitions. Foremost among the petitioners are Congress leader Jairam Ramesh who calls the Act  a brazen attack on core fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution. The petition of the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) led by Assaddudin Owaisi says the CAA violates the fundamental right to equality and aims at granting citizenship to illegal immigrants based on their religion. The SC has given the Government four weeks time to respond to all the petitions. The Court also said it will consider if the matter requires to be referred to a Constitutional Bench.

Several groups and individuals from North East India including the North East Students’ Organisation (NESO), the All Assam Students’ Union (AASU) and the scion of the royal Tripura House, Pradyot Manikya Debbarma have petitioned the apex court to exclude the region from the purview of the CAA. Pradyot Manikya has also petitioned the apex court for  implementation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) because he feels that several people holding important positions in the present Government of Tripura are not Indian citizens  but have come in from Bangladesh and have no empathy with the tribals there. He has also pointed to the fact that even job reservation in Tripura is skewed against  tribals and that tribal land is constantly being alienated in favour of non-tribals. Now the apex court has said it would hear the petitions related to Tripura and Assam separately, having regard to the special grounds pleaded in the petitions.

 Meanwhile the Khasi Students’Union (KSU) has started distributing pamphlets explaining to people the detrimental nature of the CAA. Questions have been raised as to why the Supreme Court has put off hearing a case that has agitated people, especially the youth across India and which has brought schools and universities to a grinding halt. This is a matter of concern as the Modi Government seems adamant on implementing the CAA at any costs. Questions have now arisen as to why the Government refuses to speak to agitating parties which have come to the streets spontaneously. Instead, Prime Minister, Narendra Modi and Home Minister, Amit Shah are repeating blaming the opposition parties of instigating the protests, thereby, discrediting the genuine aspirations of civil society and their capability to protest against an Act they consider unconstitutional. This is unprecedented!

Previous article
Next article
spot_img
spot_img

Related articles

Arunachal was, is, and will remain an integral part of India: MEA

New Delhi, Mar 28:  The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said on Thursday that China's repetitive claims on...

SP injured in Arunachal’s Longding as crowd pelt stones during scrutiny of nominations

Itanagar, March 28: Superintendent of Police of Arunachal Pradesh's Longding district, Dekio Gumja, was injured after some people...

Aditi Rao Hydari confirms union with Siddharth

Shillong, March 28: Actress Aditi Rao Hydari, who secretly got engaged to actor Siddharth on Wednesday, confirmed their...

India’s core sector industries clock 6.7 percent growth in February

Shillong, March 28: The eight core industries that include sectors such as coal, cement, steel and electricity posted...