Thursday, May 2, 2024
spot_img

Apex Court lifts Uttar Pradesh ban on ‘Aarakshan’

Date:

Share post:

spot_img
spot_img

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Friday “quashed and set aside” the two-month ban imposed by the Uttar Pradesh government on the screening of filmmaker Prakash Jha’s “Aarakshan”.

An apex court bench of Justice Mukundakam Sharma and Justice Anil R. Dave said the state government cannot seek deletion of certain portions of the film as this amounted to pre-censorship.

Having quashed the “suspension of screening” order, the court said: “Reservation is a very delicate and also one of the social issues and in a vibrant democracy like ours public discussion is necessary for its (democracy’s) functioning.”

Speaking for the bench, Justice Sharma said: “In fact, such discussions on social issues bring awareness which is required for effective working of democracy. In fact, when there is such public discussion and dissent there would be an informed public opinion which is necessary for our society.”Referring to an earlier judgment of the apex court, the order said: “In democracy, it is not necessary that every body should sing the same song.”

After chiding the Uttar Pradesh government for suspending screening of the film, the court said: “Once the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has cleared the film for public view, the screening of the film can’t be stopped.”

The court noted that in the case of “Aarakshan”, the examining committee of the CBFC had viewed the film along with experts active in Dalit movement after which it was cleared for public screening.

Referring to the Uttar Pradesh government’s contention that reservation was a very delicate issue and certain scenes in “Aarakshan” had the potential of affecting the law and order situation, the court said: “It was for the state to maintain law and order situation effectively and meaningfully.”

Rejecting the Uttar Pradesh government’s contention that the High Level Committee (HLC) set up to review the film has suggested deletion of some portions, the court said that “powers of pre-censorship is non-existent and thus not available to either HLC or the state government”.(IANS)

spot_img
spot_img

Related articles

Teachers in politics

Editor, In the editorial “Teachers in active politics” (ST 30th April, 2024) the editor raised a pertinent point, “If...

Relocation of hawkers

The State Government has stated that about 200 hawkers would be relocated in the MUDA complex to make...

Who was first? Does it matter?

By Bhogtoram Mawroh For me, the genesis of this whole debate about the foreign origin of Hinduism came about...

Justice for all

By Arun Maira The Supreme Court is raising fundamental questions about the rule of law in a democracy. In...