Tuesday, November 5, 2024
spot_img

No arrest for posts on social sites without permission: SC

Date:

Share post:

spot_img
spot_img

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said that no person should be arrested for posting objectionable comments on social networking sites without taking prior permission from senior police officials.

The apex court, which refused to pass an order for a blanket ban on the arrest of a person for making objectionable comments on websites, said state governments should ensure strict compliance of the Centre’s January 9 advisory which said that a person should not be arrested without taking permission from senior police officials.

“We direct the state governments to ensure compliance with the guidelines (issued by Centre) before making any arrest,” a bench of justices B S Chauhan and Dipak Misra said.

It said the court cannot pass an order for banning all arrest in such cases as operation of section 66A (pertaining to objectionable comments) of the Information Technology Act has not been stayed by the apex court which is examining its constitutional validity. In view of public outrage over people being arrested for making comments or liking posts on Facebook, Centre had on January 9 issued advisory to all states and UTs asking them not to arrest a person in such cases without prior approval of a senior police officer.

The advisory issued by the Centre says that, “State governments are advised that as regard to arrest of any person in complaint registered under section 66A of the Information Technology Act, the concerned police officer of a police station may not arrest any person until she/he has obtained prior approval of such arrest from an officer, not below the rank of Inspector General of Police (IGP) in metropolitan cities or of an officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) or Superintendent of Police (SP) at district level, as the case may be.”

The apex court was hearing an application seeking its direction to the authorities not to take action for posting objectionable comments during the pendency of a case before it pertaining to constitutional validity of section 66A of the Information Technology (IT) Act.

The section states that any person who sends, by means of a computer resource or communication device, any information that was grossly offensive or has a menacing character could be punished with imprisonment for a maximum term of three years, besides imposition of appropriate fine.

The petition was also filed regarding the arrest of a Hyderabad-based woman activist, who was sent to jail over her Facebook post in which certain “objectionable” comments were made against Tamil Nadu Governor K Rosaiah and Congress MLA Amanchi Krishna Mohan.

After filing of the petition, she was released by a district court at Hyderabad.(PTI)

spot_img
spot_img

Related articles

Outrage over decision to dismantle 123-year-old St. Anthony’s building

By Our Reporter SHILLONG, Nov 4: The recent decision to dismantle the historic St. Anthony’s Building, a 123-year-old landmark...

Musical evening organised by the United Sindhi Association Shillong at State Convention Centre, Shillong

Participants of a musical evening organised by the United Sindhi Association Shillong at State Convention Centre, Shillong, to...

Ward’s Lake bridge restoration hangs fire

By Our Reporter SHILLONG, Nov 4: One year after the iconic wooden bridge at Ward’s Lake (Jingkieng Nan Polok)...

UDP to name candidates for ADC polls by mid-December

By Our Reporter SHILLONG, Nov 4: The United Democratic Party (UDP) is expected to announce its candidates for the...