British judge insists burqa-clad woman must show face

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

London: A British judge has insisted that a burqa-clad woman must show her face in court to confirm her identity, saying the “principle of open justice” could not be subject to religion.

Judge Peter Murphy said he would not allow the 21-year-old defendant to stand trial in the veil, which only revealed her eyes, because a different person could go into the dock pretending to be her.

“It is necessary for this court to be satisfied that they can recognise the defendant. While I obviously respect the right to dress in any way she wishes, certainly while outside the court, the interests of justice are paramount,” he said.

During a hearing at Blackfriars Crown Court here on Thursday, Murphy said he could not accept a plea from a person whose identity he was unable to ascertain. He stressed that “the principle of open justice” could not be subject to the religion of the defendant.

“It would be easy for someone on a later occasion to appear and claim to be the defendant. The court would have no way to check on that,” he said.

According to The Daily Telegraph, the Muslim woman from Hackney in east London, whose identity cannot be revealed for legal reasons, says she cannot remove the veil in front of any men because of her religion.

She is facing an allegation of intimidating a witness in Finsbury Park, north London, in June. The woman’s barrister, Claire Burtwistle, told the court she was not prepared to lower her veil at all while men were in the courtroom. “In front of women, it is not an issue.

It is simply men that she will not allow to see her face,” she said. Burtwistle suggested that she, a female police officer or a female prison guard could identify the defendant and confirm to the court that it was the same person as in the police arrest photos.

Prosecutor Sarah Counsell said the police officer in charge of the case was content that he recognised the defendant while she was in the burqa. But the judge rejected these suggestions and adjourned the case till September 12, when the court will hear arguments over whether the woman should remove her veil. (PTI)

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

NEET paper leak case: Naveen Patnaik calls for debate in Parliament, dialogue with protesting students

Bhubaneswar, July 19: Leader of Opposition (LoP) in Odisha Assembly and Biju Janata Dal (BJD) president Naveen Patnaik...

Ram Mandir donation theft case: Tinnu Yadav, Manish Yadav questioned, taken to temple

Ayodhya, July 19 : The investigation into the theft of offerings from the Ram Mandir has entered a...

Delhi Police arrest three for sextortion-based cyber fraud

New Delhi, July 19: In a significant breakthrough, the Delhi Police cyber cell has solved a cheating and...

BJP slams K’taka Cong MLA Balakrishna over ‘Yajman’ remark on Shobha Karandlaje

Bengaluru/New Delhi, July 19 : The BJP on Sunday launched a sharp attack on the Congress after senior...