Clarification on HC ruling of Nov 24

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

SHILLONG: In the news item “HC: Guv can take decision with EC View” (ST Nov 25, 2015), the quotation from Article 361 read:  “The President, or the Governor or Rajpramukh of a State, shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any act done or purporting to be done by him in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties: Provided further that nothing in this clause shall be construed as restricting the right of any person to bring appropriate proceedings against the Governor…”
The correct Constitutional position in respect of  Article 361  is:  “The President, or the Governor or Rajpramukh of a State, shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any  act done or purporting to be done by him in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties: Provided further that nothing in this clause shall be construed as restricting the right of any person to bring appropriate proceedings against the Government of India or the Government of a State.”  The quote inadvertently cited in yesterday’s news item is regretted.

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

SC declines to stay Sonam’s bail, lists matter for July 9

Our Bureau NEW DELHI/SHILLONG, July 3: The Supreme Court on Friday declined to stay the bail granted to Sonam...

SIR row in West Shillong over ‘illegal’ form disbursal by BLO

By Our Reporter SHILLONG, July 3: A major controversy has erupted over the manner in which Enumeration Forms are...

Breakthrough to blunder: Meghalaya police lapses face zero accountability

Our Bureau SHILLONG, July 3: The Supreme Court’s refusal on Friday to stay the bail granted to prime accused...

Meghalaya still relies on 40% imported fish

15 years of Aquaculture Mission By Our Reporter SHILLONG, July 3: The Meghalaya government’s renewed thrust on developing the fisheries...