CAG refuses to share Rafale audit; cites breach of Parliament

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

NEW DELHI: The Comptroller and Auditor General has refused to disclose details about its audit in the controversial Rafale aircraft deal, saying the process is not yet complete and any disclosure at this stage will amount to breach of the Parliament’s privilege, an RTI reply said.
In its response to Pune-based activist Vihar Durve who had sought the report from CAG, the country’s auditor said, “The audit is under progress and the report is yet to be finalised.
The information cannot be given under Section 8(1)(C) of the RTI Act as the disclosure would cause breach of Parliament”. Section 8(1)(C) of the Right To Information (RTI) Act exempts information the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege of Parliament or the State Legislature. Last month, the Supreme Court had dismissed pleas challenging the deal between India and France for procurement of 36 Rafale jets, saying there was no occasion to “really doubt the decision making process” warranting setting aside of the contract. It rejected the pleas seeking lodging of an FIR and a court-monitored probe alleging irregularities in the Rs 58,000 crore deal, in which both the countries have entered into an inter-governmental agreement.
“The pricing details have, however, been shared with the Comptroller and Auditor General, and the report of the CAG has been examined by the Public Accounts Committee. Only a redacted portion of the report was placed before the Parliament and is in public domain,” the bench led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi had said, relying on the sealed note submitted by the government.
After the Congress raised the issue that no such CAG report had been placed before the PAC, the government approached the court seeking changes in the judgment. In the application, the Centre said the two sentences in paragraph 25 of the judgement appeared to have been based on the note submitted by it along with the pricing details in a sealed cover, but indicated the words used by the court lent a different meaning.
The Centre made it clear that it did not say that the CAG report was examined by PAC or a redacted portion was placed before Parliament. (PTI)

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

Bangladesh: BNP targets Jamaat over 1971 Liberation War stance, demands apology

Dhaka, June 29: The ruling Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) government criticised the radical Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami over its...

Panna mine labourer strikes it rich, finds 11.19-carat diamond

Bhopal/Panna, June 29: In a remarkable tale of perseverance and fortune, Rakesh Gond from Panna district in Madhya...

Siya took Rs 1 crore from Ketan for wedding shopping, gave it to Chetan: Sources

Pune, June 29: Fresh revelations have surfaced in the investigation into the murder of 26-year-old Pune-based realtor Ketan...

Indian passport application fee to go up from July 1

New Delhi, June 29: The Ministry of External Affairs has raised charges for passport-related services which will make...