Manipulation for ‘money’ during Rio Olympics boxing, reveals investigation

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

New Delhi, Sep 30: More than 10 bouts in the 2016 Rio Olympics boxing competition were manipulated for “money” and other “perceived benefits”, an independent investigation has revealed, prompting the International Boxing Association (AIBA) to promise a “tough” selection process for referees and judges at the upcoming men’s world championship.
The first phase report of the McLaren Global Sport Solutions’ independent investigation into boxing, which was accessed by PTI, has been handed to AIBA and revealed that “a system for the manipulation of bouts by officials existed at Rio”.
In all, 14 bouts came under the scanner, including two finals. “It was a complete reversal of Santa Clause’s myth of the naughty and the nice. The naughty were gifted an appointment at Rio because they were willing, or under pressure to support any request for manipulation, while the nice were left out,” the report noted referring to the dubious appointment of officials at the Games.
“Bouts were manipulated for money, perceived benefit of AIBA, or to thank National Federations and their Olympic committees, and, on occasion, hosts of competitions for their financial support and political backing.
“The investigation to date has concluded that such manipulation involved significant six figure sums on occasion. The manipulation methodology relied upon corruption within the cadre of corrupted R&Js (referees and judges) and the Draw Commission,” it added.
The AIBA promised a thorough clean-up. “AIBA noted the findings regarding the Rio 2016 boxing tournament with concern and confirmed that extensive reforms have been implemented to ensure sporting integrity at current AIBA competitions,” the body, which is trying to regain affiliation from the International Olympic Committee (IOC), stated.
Referees, judges and technical officials being appointed to the World Championships in Belgrade, Serbia from October 24 now face tough selection criteria, including background and other checks conducted by MGSS, headed by Prof Richard McLaren.
The report said that the then AIBA head Ching-Kuo Wu held direct responsibility for the fiasco in Rio. The investigation found that two bouts caused the “system to publicly collapse.”
The first was the infamous bantamweight quarter-final in which World and European Champion Michael Conlan lost to Vladimir Nikitin from Russia despite pummelling him in the ring.
The other was a gold medal heavyweight match between Russia’s Evgeny Tischenko and Kazakhstan’s Vasily Levit, which the latter lost despite his clear dominance. “These two bouts were the catalyst for the house of cards to come crashing down. The first blow was (IOC President) Thomas Bach refusing to undertake the medal ceremony in the heavyweight gold medal match, despite having been scheduled to do so,” the report noted.
McLaren was appointed by AIBA to investigate and suggest reforms in governance, and sporting and financial integrity, as demanded by the IOC, which recently stated that there are deep concerns about boxing’s future in the Olympic roster going forward. (PTI)

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

The Paradox of Giving

As parenting becomes more child-centred than ever, are we confusing love with self-erasure; and raising adults ill prepared...

Five ways to make your clothes last longer

Care labels on clothes are no longer enough for supporting consumers to enjoy their clothes for longer. Clothing retailers...

A Tablespoon of Sugar

Every year, Maple Grove School held a cooking competition, and every year the theme was different. Some years...

Kidspace

Esther Maitphang Lyngskor, Class III, Loreto Convent  Alden Laksan, Class II, BK Bajoria School (winner) Avianna Joyce Majaw, Class I,...