Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Was thinking of panel for complaints against officials, especially police: CJI

Date:

Share post:

New Delhi, Oct 1 : Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana on Friday orally observed that he had thought of creating a panel to examine atrocities and complaints against bureaucrats, particularly police officers, headed by the Chief Justice of the high court concerned.
“I have lot of reservations at the way, how bureaucracy particularly, how police officers are behaving in this country.
“I was at one time thinking of creating a standing committee to examine atrocities and complaints against bureaucrats, particularly police officers, headed by the Chief Justice of the high court.. I want to reserve that.. Don’t want to do now,” he said.
A bench also comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli was hearing a plea filed by suspended Additional Director General of Police of Chhattisgarh Gurjinder Pal Singh seeking protection from arrest in criminal cases – sedition, extortion, and owning disproportionate assets – against him.
On September 27, the top court told Singh’s counsel that his client cannot take protection from arrest in every case, and pointed out that things take a wrong turn when people start extracting money, as they were close to the government.
“When you’re good with government, you may extract… then you’ve to pay back with interest. This is too much, why should we grant protection to such officers?”, the Chief Justice had remarked, adding that such police officers must not be protected but must be jailed.
On August 26, the top court had orally pointed out at a disturbing trend, where police officials, siding with the party in power, later getting targeted when another political dispensation comes into power.
The Chief Justice had said: “When a political party is in power, police officials side with it…. then, when a new party comes into power, the government initiates action against those officials. This is a new trend, which needs to be stopped.”
Three special leave petitions have been moved before the apex court against the Chhattisgarh High Court orders, where the court declined to quash the FIRs against Singh.
A case was filed against Singh based on a written complaint by the state Anti-Corruption Bureau, based on preliminary findings that he had amassed disproportionate assets. Certain documents were seized from his possession, which pointed at his involvement in a conspiracy against the government. (IANS)

Related articles

Deliver ‘crushing blow to terrorism’: PM Modi’s fiery directive to armed forces post-Pahalgam attack

New Delhi, April 29:  In a high-stakes emergency meeting, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made it clear that India...

Assam Higher Secondary exam results to be declared on April 30

Guwahati, April 29: The Assam State School Education Board (ASSEB) will announce the results of the Higher Secondary...

India’s gold demand crosses 800 tonnes in 2024: Report

Mumbai, April 29: India's gold demand surged past 800 tonnes in 2024, driven by a rise in jewellery...

If we think being in majority will protect us, we will be wiped out: K’taka RSS leader on Pahalgam attack

Mangaluru (Karnataka), April 29: Senior Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) leader Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat has stated that “if we...