‘Position of trust’: Bank employee’s retirement can’t absolve misconduct charge, says SC

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

New Delhi, Feb 11 : The Supreme Court on Friday said bank employees hold a position of trust and superannuation will not absolve the employee of the charges of misappropriation of funds committed while on duty.

A bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka said: “Merely because the employee stood superannuated in the meanwhile, will not absolve him from the misconduct which he had committed in discharge of his duties and looking into the nature of misconduct which he had committed, he was not entitled for any indulgence.”

“The bank employee always holds the position of trust where honesty and integrity are the sine qua non but it would never be advisable to deal with such matters leniently,” it added.

The judgment came on an appeal filed by the United Bank of India.

The bench said looking into seriousness of the nature of allegations levelled against the respondent employee, the punishment of dismissal inflicted upon him in no manner could be said to be shockingly disproportionate which would have required to be interfered with by the tribunal in exercise of its powers.

“After such nature of allegations stood proved, the disciplinary authority, after taking into consideration the record of inquiry and the post held by the respondent employee, punished him with the penalty of dismissal from service,” noted the bench.

The bench set aside the orders passed by the high court and a tribunal under the Industrial Disputes Act, which declared that dismissal of Bachan Prasad Lall for misappropriation of funds was disproportionate and directed his reinstatement. The high court had declined to interfere with the tribunal’s order on the ground that the employee had superannuated.

“The finding of guilt recorded by the inquiry officer in his report was confirmed at all later stages by the disciplinary/appellate authority and even after judicial scrutiny by the division bench in the impugned judgment but it still refrained from interference on the premise that the employee had superannuated in the year 2007,” noted the top court.(IANS)

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

Gen Seth calls on Defence Minister Singh after taking over as Army Chief

New Delhi, July 2: General Dhiraj Seth, who assumed charge as the 31st Chief of the Army Staff...

Faizabad Bar Association files complaint naming Champat Rai, others over Ram Temple embezzlement

Ayodhya, July 2: The Faizabad Bar Association on Thursday submitted a formal complaint at the Ram Janmabhoomi police...

Meghalaya records highest monsoon rainfall deficit in Northeast at 74 pc: IMD

Shillong, July 2: Meghalaya, known for hosting some of the wettest places on the earth, has recorded the...

Proactive efforts of Assam Forest Dept lead to sharp decline in human deaths Assam’s HEC-hit Lakhipur

Guwahati, July 2: Human deaths caused by human-elephant conflict (HEC) have declined sharply in one of Assam's worst...