Tuesday, July 8, 2025
spot_img

Assam tribunal displeased over builder’s conduct; dismisses appeal

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

Guwahati, July 27: The Assam Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has conveyed its strong displeasure over the conduct of a builder who demanded payment from buyers for non-existent additional built-up area of a villa purchased by them.

The tribunal made strong observations while deciding an appeal filed by the builder in the case of Arya Erectors India Pvt Ltd versus Padum Deori and another.

In this case, the buyers had executed a deed of agreement with the builder for the purchase of a villa in ‘Arya Smart Living’, Abhaypur, north Guwahati for a total built-up area of 1877 square feet.

According to the agreement, the villa was to be completed and handed over to the buyers within 36 months (by February 9, 2019). After the buyers had made 90 percent of the payment, the builder demanded additional payment for an increase of 473 square feet in the built-up area of the villa.

“However, a joint physical measurement, conducted by technical persons in the presence of the builder, revealed that the actual built-up area of the villa was 1756 square feet. In other words, the built-up area was 121 square feet less than the area mentioned in the deed of agreement whereas the builder was claiming that it was 473 square feet more,” an official statement issued here on Wednesday said.

Neither the builder nor the buyers disputed the measurement taken during the joint inspection.

“Dismissing the appeal, the tribunal directed that the payment for the villa be made only for the actual built-up area of 1756 square feet. The builder will have to pay the buyers’ interest at the rate of State Bank of India’s marginal cost of lending plus two percent on the amount already paid by the buyers from February 10, 2019 until the date of handing over possession,” the statement said.

“The builder was directed to complete the exercise of execution of the conveyance deed and the handing over of possession of the villa to them within six weeks,” it added.

Expressing strong displeasure over the conduct of the builder, the tribunal observed that the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 was enacted with the objective of ensuring regulation and promotion of the real estate sector in an efficient and transparent manner as well as to protect the interests of consumers in the real estate sector.

It was also observed that the present case illustrates, in a way, why the need for regulating the real estate sector, which led to enactment of the Act in the year 2016, had been emphasised.

 

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

India debunks Pakistani digital army’s claims on recall of embassy official from Jakarta

New Delhi, July 8: Calling out Pakistan’s malicious campaign, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting on Tuesday issued...

Haj 2026 application process to end on July 31: Ministry of Minority Affairs

New Delhi, July 8:  The Ministry of Minority Affairs said on Tuesday that applications for Haj 2026 can...

Eastern Air Command chief meets Arunachal Governor, discuss security issues

Itanagar, July 8:  Shillong-based Eastern Air Command chief Air Marshal Surat Singh held a meeting with Arunachal Pradesh...

UTs tourism secretaries meet in Srinagar befitting reply to terrorism: J&K L-G

Srinagar, July 8:  Jammu and Kashmir Lt Governor Manoj Sinha said on Tuesday that the meeting of the...