Delhi court likely to pronounce verdict on Sanjay Singh’s bail plea today

New Delhi, Dec 21: A Delhi court on Thursday said that it will pronounce its judgement on Friday on the bail plea of AAP Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Singh in connection with a money laundering case related to the alleged excise policy scam.
Special Judge M.K. Nagpal of Rouse Avenue Court had reserved his verdict on December 12.
The ED opposed the bail application, citing the ongoing investigation and expressing concerns that Singh’s release could potentially obstruct the investigation, tamper with evidence, and influence witnesses.
On Thursday, the court also extended the AAP leader’s judicial custody in the case and asked the ED to provide a copy of its fifth supplementary charge sheet and related documents to him.
On December 19, the court had taken cognisance of the charge sheet, and issued Singh’s production warrant for Thursday.
Singh has claimed that he was not a flight risk and there was no allegation against him of influencing the witnesses. He had urged the court that he should be granted bail since he has deep roots in society and that “for 15 months there was no allegation of my interfering or influencing in the probe by either the ED or the CBI”.
Mathur had said that since the supplementary charge sheet against Singh has already been filed, there was some kind of finality regarding the collection of evidence which should be the basis for granting him bail.
Counsel had said Singh was neither an accused, and was never arrested, or charge sheeted in the predicate offence (the alleged corruption in the excise scam) being probed by the CBI, and that he was not even summoned by the CBI in the corruption case.
“Now they are saying I received kickbacks, but ED did not say a single word about this money before this court or superior courts in matters pertaining to co-accused Manish Sisodia, when they produced a flow-chart of money allegedly being laundered,” .
Earlier, the judge had allowed Singh to sign some documents related to development work as an MP. “Court sees no reason to refuse private treatment to the accused.
Hence, the jail superintendent concerned is directed to ensure the appropriate treatment,” the judge had said. (IANS)