17 yrs of suffering has come to an end: Ampareen

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

By Our Reporter

SHILLONG, Sep 4: Acquittal by the High Court of Meghalaya in the 2008-09 infamous “white ink case” or the “Education Scam,” has come as a huge reprieve for Cabinet Minister Ampareen Lyngdoh.
Lyngdoh, who was given a warm reception at her residence by her family members and supporters after the verdict, said she and her family suffered for 17 years. She said it was humiliating for her to attend hundreds of court hearings.
“I had told my mom I didn’t do it,” she said and added that she never misused her office to favour anyone.
“This verdict validates our stand that the name of the late PG Marbaniang is not compromised. We are a family that upholds justice,” she said, relief writ large on her face.
“I will pray for God’s guidance to give me strength to forgive those who harmed us,” she said, adding that she will fight the case if the verdict is challenged in the Supreme Court.
Asked about the fate of the two other accused, she said she is not answerable to those individuals and this judgment is specifically for her with respect to her case.
Earlier, Supreme Court lawyer and junior counsel of Salman Khurshid, Sanchita Ain told media persons that the Chief Justice in the open court remarked in clear terms that she is being discharged of all the charges and the orders passed by the trial court.
The charges against her are being set aside and therefore, no case exists against her as on today, Ain said.
Earlier, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had charge-sheeted Lyngdoh and retired government officials JD Sangma and Ameka Lyngdoh for “manipulating” the score sheets of candidates.
In 2017, the High Court ordered the CBI to take over the investigation after the Meghalaya Police had registered a case relating to alleged mass manipulation, tampering of score sheets and interference in the selection of assistant teachers in lower primary schools.
To a query, Ain expressed optimism that the High Court’s verdict will be upheld by the Supreme Court, if challenged.
Stating that the chapter is finally closed with this “historic” verdict, she said anyone has the right to challenge the order but the High Court has found that Lyngdoh had no involvement in the charges levelled against her.
Ain added that the High Court also found that the chargesheet filed by the CBI was flawed and that, it held no case was made out.

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

‘Don’t waste our time’: SC refuses urgent hearing on plea against police action on students

New Delhi, July 22: The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to urgently list a petition challenging the alleged...

Ram Temple trust unlikely to finalise first CEO as screening process remains incomplete

New Delhi, July 22: Amid the offering embezzlement row, the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust on Wednesday...

EAM Jaishankar meets Marco Rubio, Penny Wong in Manila; discusses global developments

Manila, July 22: External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar on Wednesday held talks with US Secretary of State...

SC issues notice to six rebel Shiv Sena(UBT) MPs over merger with Shinde faction

New Delhi, July 22: The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notices to the Lok Sabha Speaker's office and...