By Our Reporter
SHILLONG, Dec 15: The Meghalaya Public Service Commission (MPSC) on Monday reiterated its dedication to candidates and the state, emphasising its serious approach to its constitutional mandate despite recent media reports of allegations against it.
In an official statement, the MPSC described the allegations as motivated by mala fide intent and noted that they were made anonymously. The commission said it has taken note of the claims and is actively strengthening its monitoring mechanisms.
To address concerns among candidates and the public, the MPSC explained that expanding examination centres beyond Shillong and Tura was done purely for the convenience of applicants from remote districts. Uniform guidelines are provided to all venue supervisors to maintain fairness during exams.
On claims of unfair practices, such as mobile phones in exam halls, the commission stressed that a strict standard operating procedure (SOP) is enforced at all centres. The Commission sought assistance from district administrations and police for thorough frisking of candidates.
While acknowledging the need for robust measures like metal detector checks, the MPSC admitted that isolated incidents—such as a mobile phone being smuggled in—could occur despite precautions. In response to a reported case at one venue, MPSC said it has updated protocols and directed invigilators to stay vigilant and report any irregularities immediately for action.
Regarding accusations of assistance provided by invigilators, the commission said it requests district magistrates or deputy commissioners to investigate complaints. However, without specific details (e.g., venue, hall number, or centre name), post-exam verification becomes extremely difficult, it said.
The MPSC highlighted that all examination staff now receive identity cards with unique serial numbers for easier identification in case of complaints.
It reaffirmed strict confidentiality in handling question papers, stating there is no possibility of leaks, and invited accusers to provide concrete evidence for legal action.
Finally, the commission urged candidates and the public to report verified malpractices with details like the involved candidate’s roll number, hall, venue, and centre. Complaints against staff should include their ID number and be reported to the venue supervisor immediately or emailed to [email protected] within seven days of the exam.
Complainants are required to provide their own details (kept confidential) to discourage baseless claims, the MPSC said, while welcoming constructive criticism to uphold the highest standards of recruitment.
