SEOUL: South Korea on Friday rejected a call from the reclusive North to halt “provocative” military drills with the United States, saying that as a democracy it didn’t carry out preemptive strikes.
North Korea traditionally demands the South to call off the drills, scheduled for February and March this year, labeling them as a prelude to invasion, but this year it also suggested both sides take steps to ease tension, including a moratorium on mutual verbal attacks.
“The Key Resolve and the Foal Eagle exercises will go ahead as scheduled … (South Korea) is a democratic country so we do not engage in preemptive strikes,” South Korean Defence Ministry spokesman Kim Min-seok said at a briefing.
Tension soared early last year as Pyongyang reacted angrily to tightened U.N. sanctions imposed in response to its latest nuclear test. North Korea said it would retaliate against any hostile moves by striking at the United States, Japan and South Korea, triggering months of fiery rhetoric.
South Korea also said the North’s latest demand, carried in a long statement issued by its National Defence Commission, was disingenuous, as it insulted the South even as North Korean leader Kim Jong Un called for improved ties.
The two Koreas have yet to come up with any substantial measures to reduce military tension on the world’s last Cold War frontier.
After more than 60 years since the end of 1950-53 Korean War, the two sides remain technically at war as the conflict ended with an armistice rather than a treaty. But analysts say the North cannot risk igniting a conventional military conflict it would almost certainly lose.
Many North Korea watchers believe it could instead launch another long-range rocket or push ahead with a nuclear test. It has conducted three nuclear tests, the last one in February last year.
The North could also stage another artillery attack on South Korean territory as it did in 2010, and risk provoking a military response from Seoul that could trigger a wider conflict.
The North’s rocket launches are banned under U.N. resolutions because they are viewed as part of a process of proving the technology for an intercontinental nuclear weapon. (Reuters)
