Editor,
Local politicians are right to demand an apology from Mr. Sunil Deodhar for his recent divisive speech at Pynter. However, this is not a child who accidentally broke a flower pot. In his apology, he even tries to hide behind Christian programmes conducted by his organization, but such programmes do not justify either his own behaviour or words as an individual in this instance.
Anyone who heard the speech would know that Sunil Deodhar chose his words very carefully and deliberately. He knew exactly what he was saying when he stated that development occurs along religious lines among the Khasis and Jaintias. Such divisive speech must not be entertained. It is not a matter of disrespect or pain to any section of society. It’s a matter of intent. Even if there is any factual accuracy in his claims, his speech was not one to bring a solution or unity, but one that incited discord instead.
Let me reiterate – an apology is necessary but not sufficient for an adult person (mis-)speaking to the public. In my humble opinion, the person should also retract his words in front of the same crowd he spoke those words to. It also has to be stated that a person saying such things is culpable under the Indian Penal Code Section 153A for inciting communal discord. Such an offence carries a punishment that includes imprisonment up to three (3) years, fines, or both.
We have to hold such people accountable for their words. Our society is already fragmented enough without such nuisance-makers sowing more discord between us. Even if such speech were not unlawful, there must be appropriate consequences for such an irresponsible use of a public platform, such as losing the right to use such platforms again, or being removed from their position of responsibility. We Khasis, of whatever religion, are well-aware of the power of the spoken word, and we must be vigilant to not allow its abuse by any miscreant.
Yours etc.,
Ezra L. Rynjah
Via email
Khasi–Jaintia: The Dash Is a Bond, Not a Minus
Editor,
During the recent Short Duration Discussion on the Report of the Expert Committee on the Review of the State Reservation Policy, Ardent M. Basaiawmoit of the Voice of the People Party repeatedly used the term “Khasi and Garo.” But the official reservation categories in Meghalaya are “Khasi–Jaintia” and “Garo.” This is not a small difference. In reservation matters, every word matters. The name of a category decides who is included and how benefits are distributed.
If the law clearly says “Khasi–Jaintia,” then why are leaders saying only “Khasi and Garo” in public? If the present “Khasi–Jaintia” category is still correct and reflects reality, then it should be defended openly and the proper term should be used. If there is a need to change the system, then that should be said clearly and a proper review should be demanded.
Ardent M. Basaiawmoit often speaks about reform and accountability. This is the right time for him to show that commitment in practice. If he believes the classification needs review, he should formally ask the Government to examine and clarify it. That would be a clear and responsible step.
If, however, he does not accept that Jaintias are distinct within the reservation framework, then he should say so openly and formally demand the complete removal of the word “Jaintia” from the category. That would clearly leave only two categories – Khasi and Garo. What is said in speeches must match what is written in policy. There should be no confusion, no double meaning, and no selective use of words. If “Jaintia” is not to be recognised in practice, then it should not remain in the law merely as a token name. Clarity requires either full recognition or formal deletion nothing in between.
This is not about dividing people. We firmly believe in the Nehruvian principle of unity in diversity, where different identities are respected and recognised. It is not about forcing everyone into a single uniform identity under a mistaken idea of unity in uniformity. True unity does not erase distinct identities; it acknowledges and respects them with honesty and fairness.
Yours etc.,
Mantre Hame Dkhar,
Via email
Upgrading IIPH Shillong into a State University an Important Milestone
Editor,
I would like to express my appreciation for the recent report published in The Shillong Times on February 25, 2026 regarding the Cabinet’s approval to upgrade the Indian Institute of Public Health (IIPH) Shillong into a State University. This is indeed a commendable milestone and reflects the fulfilment of the government’s vision to develop Meghalaya as an educational hub for the Northeast.
The establishment of a full-fledged public health university will greatly benefit students across the region who often face financial and logistical challenges while pursuing higher education in distant states. This initiative will not only strengthen academic opportunities within Meghalaya but also enhance the state’s reputation as a centre for quality education and professional training.
I would like to convey my sincere appreciation to Hon’ble Chief Minister Conrad Sangma, Principal Secretary Sampath Kumar, the Project Director and faculty of IIPH Shillong, as well as the Health & Family Welfare Department, for their dedication and collective efforts in achieving this important milestone.
I also urge students and young professionals to consider pursuing studies in Public Health at IIPH Shillong, as the field offers significant career opportunities across government departments, national institutions, and international organisations. Public health professionals are increasingly essential for strengthening healthcare systems and improving community well-being.
Furthermore, I request that additional courses relevant to the specific needs of our state be introduced under the Institute, ensuring that academic programmes remain practical, locally relevant, and aligned with emerging healthcare challenges.
While similar institutes exist in other parts of the country—such as the Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar, Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi NCR, Indian Institute of Public Health, Bhubaneswar, and Indian Institute of Public Health, Hyderabad—Shillong becoming the fifth institute to attain university status is a proud achievement for the North East.
I extend my best wishes to the entire IIPH team. This achievement marks not an end, but the beginning of an important journey towards advancing public health education, research, and service in the region.
Yours etc.,
Dr. B R Laitphlang,
Via email
