Monday, September 15, 2025
spot_img

Obama faces bipartisan criticism over foreign policy

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama faced criticism over his foreign policy from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers on Monday as he wrestled with crises in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Ukraine.
Republican lawmakers seized on Obama’s comment on Thursday when he said, ‘We don’t have a strategy yet’ for confronting the Islamic State militant group, saying it suggested indecisiveness.
Influential Democrats chimed in with their own critiques of Obama’s foreign policy on Monday, chiding him for being ‘too cautious’ on Syria, and urging him to do more to help Ukraine resist Russian advances.
‘I’ve learned one thing about this president, and that is he’s very cautious. Maybe, in this instance, too cautious,’ Democrat Dianne Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ program today when asked about Obama’s comments about dealing with Islamic State militants.
Representative Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, cautioned that any U.S. action in Syria had to be carefully calibrated to avoid inadvertently supporting the regime of Bashar al-Assad.
But he joined Republicans in urging Obama to provide more than just ‘non-lethal’ aid to the Ukrainian government as it resisted Russian forces.
‘We should be more forceful when supporting the Ukrainian government,’ Smith told CBS’s ‘Face the Nation’ program. ‘I think it’s appropriate to up that aid to make them a more capable fighting force, to resist this incursion.’
The critical comments came as the Obama administration faced myriad crises around the world, including a reported attack on an annex to the U.S. embassy in Tripoli, Libya.
In response to the criticism of Obama’s comment on the lack of a strategy, White House officials said it reflected the fact that the Pentagon was still developing options for possible military action in Syria.
US officials emphasized that the administration does have a broader strategy, and the military plan is only one element.
The lawmakers statements reflect growing concern about potential homeland security threats posed by hundreds of U.S., British and Canadian citizens who have trained to fight in Syria. But Obama may still have trouble winning support from a deeply divided Congress for expanded military action against the Islamic State.
‘His foreign policy is in absolute freefall,’ said Representative Mike Rogers, who heads the House Intelligence Committee. ‘This ‘don’t do stupid stuff’ policy isn’t working,’
Republican Senator John McCain said U.S. action against Islamic State would require more U.S. special operations forces, more air controllers; more advisers to train the Iraqi military, which was near collapse; and other countries to partner with.
But McCain said Obama was having trouble building a coalition to take action against Islamic State militants after backing away from strikes against Syria last year.
‘These people … are very cynical, particularly the Saudis and others, because we said we were going to strike Syria. (Reuters)

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

When Learning Turns To Exhaustion

Editor, I write this as a concerned student of the 5th semester in one of the most prestigious colleges...

Lessons from Nepal

A modicum of order has been established in Nepal with the effective intervention of its army and installation...

The Rs 6000 Cr Urban Overhaul Plan

By Toki Blah “Urban transformation with an investment of Rs 6000 crores across urban centres such as Shillong, Jowai...

Echoes of Change: How Each Generation Shaped the World’s Turning Points

By Jairaj Chhetry History is not written by rulers alone. It is equally shaped by ordinary men and women,...