TOKYO: A Japanese nuclear power plant has come under fire for trying to sway the outcome of a public forum on atomic safety, dealing a fresh blow to the industry’s credibility four months after the world’s biggest nuclear disaster since Chernobyl.
An employee with Kyushu Electric Power Co instructed workers at the utility and affiliates to pose as ordinary citizens and send e-mails backing the restart of reactors in southern Japan to a televised public hearing.
A massive earthquake and tsunami crippled the coastal Fukushima-Daiichi power plant in northeast Japan on March 13, sparking a fuel-rod meltdown and the biggest nuclear crisis since Chernobyl in Ukraine in 1986.
The plant is still leaking radiation in a protracted disaster which prompted the government to go back to ”scratch” on its nuclear energy policy. Only 19 of Japan’s 54 reactors are running, the others idled mainly by quake damage or scheduled safety inspections.
Kyushu Electic President Toshio Manabe apologised for the email scandal today.
”I am reflecting deeply on the actions that tried to influence a hearing that should be fair and neutral,” Jiji news agency quoted Manabe as telling a senior vice minister for trade and industry. ”I apologise to the people.” Analysts say the scandal reflects panic in Japan’s atomic power industry, long coddled by political, corporate and regulatory interests dubbed the ”nuclear village” but now facing growing anti-nuclear sentiment as workers battle to end the Fukushima crisis.
”There is growing suspicion that power companies are playing fast and loose with data to support their cause and will go so far as to orchestrate public support,” said Jeffrey Kingston, director of Asian studies at Temple University’s Japan campus. ”The more the media pulls back the veil, the angrier the public is getting.” The e-mail scandal has been daily fodder for mainstream media, often accused of being soft on the industry.
Public trust in utilities and their regulators has already been dented by patchy and slow disclosure about the crisis at Tokyo Electric Power Co’s Fukushima plant. ”They (Tokyo Electric) have zero credibility,” Kingston said, adding the email affair was also embarrassing for the government itself.
Industry critics said the e-mail scandal was no surprise, but added it nonetheless deepened doubts about both safety and whether threatened power outages were a real risk.
”The public reaction is leaning against nuclear power and I think the utilities feel a sense of crisis,” said Harumi Kondaiji, a local lawmaker in the western city of Tsuruga, host to three reactors. ”At this point, we cannot believe them.”
With the government’s own credibility on the line after confusing signals on preconditions for restarts, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said on Friday that safety came first.
”I believe ensuring nuclear-related safety and a sense of security take higher priority than ensuring a feeling of security about energy supply,” Edano told a news conference.
With just 19 reactors still running and many of those set to undergo regular inspections in coming months, the country could be without nuclear power — which before the crisis supplied almost 30 per cent of electricity — by the end of April. Even local authorities previously inclined to take the utilities at their word expressed anger.
”We thought we had a relationship of trust, but now there are cracks,” Hideo Kishimoto, mayor of the southern town of Genkai which hosts the Kyushu Electric reactors in question, told a TV broadcaster.
The e-mail scandal was another twist in a confusing saga over whether utilities can win local communities’ agreement to resume operations at reactors shut down for regular checks.
The central government announced abruptly this week that it planned stress tests to check the safety of all 54 reactors, despite earlier safety assurances and requests to restart reactors after regular inspections were finished.
On Thursday, Genkai’s Kishimoto withdrew approval for the restart of two Kyushu reactors and a day later another utility said it was postponing a planned restart after failure to gain local approval, which is required not by law but by custom. (PTI)