Tuesday, September 17, 2024
spot_img

SC upholds as valid Majithia wage boards

Date:

Share post:

spot_img
spot_img

New Delhi: In a morale booster for working journalists and newspaper employees, the Supreme Court Friday upheld the validity of the Majithia wage boards, observing their recommendations for wage hike are based on genuine considerations. It also junked newspaper organisations’ challenge to the constitutional validity of the working journalists and newspaper employees act.

Justice G.R. Majithia was appointed chairman of the two wage boards for journalists and non-journalists in 2009, and his recommendations for wage hikes for both categoriers of newspapwer employees were notified by the government Nov 11, 2011.

A bench of Chief Justice P. Sathasivam, Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Shiva Kirti Singh said: “Accordingly, we hold that the recommendations of the Wage Boards are valid in law, based on genuine and acceptable considerations, and there is no valid ground for interference under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.” Upholding the validity of the Majithia wage boards, the court said: “The wages as revised/determined shall be payable from Nov 11, 2011, when the government notified the recommendations of the Majithia Wage Boards.”

“All the arrears up to March 2014 shall be paid to all eligible people in four equal instalments within a period of one year from today and continue to pay the revised wages from April 2014 onwards,” the court said in its order.

Examining the challenge to the constitutional validity of the Working Journalist Act, Chief Justice Sathasivam, pronouncing the judgment, said the court was of the opinion that the challenge to the act “is wholly unfounded, baseless and completely untenable”.

Addressing the contention by the newspaper organisations that the wage boards have not taken into account regional variations, the court said: “It is clear from the report that the Wage Boards have categorized the HRA and transport allowance into X, Y and Z category regions, which reflects that the cost on accommodation and transport in different regions in the country was considered.”

The court also rejected the newspaper organisations’ objection to the appointment of former law secretary K.M.Sahni and journalist P.N.Prasanna Kumar as independent members of the board.

“Merely because K.M. Sahni was a part of the government that took the decision to set up the Wage Boards, does not automatically follow that he ceased to be an ‘independent’ member of the Wage Boards. K.M. Sahni is an independent member of the Board and cannot be considered to be ‘biased’.” (IANS)

spot_img
spot_img

Related articles

PM Modi travels in Ahmedabad Metro after inaugurating 2nd phase

Ahmedabad, Sep 16: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday inaugurated the 20.8 km long Ahmedabad Metro Rail Project...

Iran one of the foremost executioners of women globally, say foreign ministers in joint statement

London, Sep 16: Women and girls continue to face severe repression in Iran, the Secretary of State of...

RG Kar protests: Junior doctors delegation, CM begin talks after govt allows transcription of proceedings

Kolkata, Sep 16:  After several abortive attempts, the meeting between Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and a delegation of...

Road accidents in Uganda kill over 230 schoolchildren in nine months: Police

Kampala, Sep 16: A total of 239 schoolchildren have been killed in road accidents in the past nine...