India-China jointly submit proposals to WTO calling for elimination of ‘Amber Box’ support

New Delhi:  India and China jointly submitted a proposal to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) calling for the elimination, by developed countries, of the most trade-distorting form of farm subsidies, known in WTO parlance as Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS) or ‘Amber Box’ support as a prerequisite for consideration of other reforms in domestic support negotiations. This is an important proposal by India and China in view of the ongoing negotiations for the upcoming 11th Ministerial Conference of the WTO to be held in Buenos Aires in December 2017. It counters the efforts by some countries to target the subsidies of the developing countries while letting the developed countries retain their huge farm subsidies.
According to a Commerce Ministry statement issued here today, the Proposal was submitted on July 18, 2017. The joint paper reveals that developed countries, including the US, the EU and Canada, have been consistently providing trade-distorting subsidies to their farmers at levels much higher than the ceiling applicable to developing countries. Developed countries have more than 90 per cent of global AMS entitlements amounting to nearly 160-billion-dollar. Most of the developing countries, including India and China, do not have AMS entitlements.
Listing the most heavily and frequently subsidised products by the US, the EU and Canada since 1995, the paper calls for elimination of such subsidies. The numbers reveal that subsidies for many items provided by the developed world are over 50 per cent and some even more that 100 per cent of the value of production of the product concerned, while developing countries are forced to contain it within 10 per cent of the value of production. In other words, while developed Members have access to huge amount of AMS beyond their de minimis (these are the minimal amounts of domestic support that are allowed even though they distort trade, up to 5 per cent of the value of production for developed countries, 10 per cent for developing.) in contrast most developing Members have access only to de minimis resulting in a major asymmetry in the rules on agricultural trade.
The paper illustrates the adverse effects of concentration of AMS on a few products, which no other proposal in the WTO addresses. Elimination of AMS, India and China believe, should be the starting point of reforms rather than seeking reduction of subsidies by developing countries, some of which like India provide a subsistence amount of about 260 dollar per farmer per annum compared to over 100 times more in some developed countries.(UNI)