Budget 2020
By Shivaji Sarkar
The country was eagerly looking forward to a ‘happiness’ Budget. It was pining for a cut in multiple pricing, low prices and high growth. Unfortunately, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s Budget does not ensure this bare minimum, notwithstanding her expectation on 10 per cent GDP growth.
Sitharaman tries to send political messages to Kashmir, Tamil Nadu and assuage the conservatives, through quotes in Kashmiri but has failed to listen to her own Economic Survey. The bankers, RBI or the IMF doubt the growth path. She talks of an ‘Aspirational India’. It focuses on rural development, wellness, water, sanitation, education and skills and a farm product for each district. While the allocations or increases are meagre, promises of wider coverage such as 1000 more hospitals under PM Jan Arogya and immunisation of 12 more diseases under Indradhanush have been made.
The INDSAT examination to attract students from Asia and Africa is a good move to make the country an education hub. But with that, education will require FDI and become more expensive. Skill development is given Rs 3000 crore out of an education allocation of Rs 99,000 crore, an increase of Rs 6,000 crore. A cash-strapped government is high on spreading its thali (plate) and has little offer to check inflationary trends.
The sagging economy needs relief. Even the farmers in the gaon (village), garib kisan (poor farmer) budget lose despite higher access to farm credit. Subsidy cuts outweigh it. The cut in fertilizer subsidy by Rs 9,000 crore increases farm costs. Besides, the massive Rs 69,000 crore cut in food subsidy to Rs 1.15 trillion from Rs 1.84 trillion in 2019-20 estimates is to hit the procurements by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) the most. The farmers even now are unable to get requisite MSP. The coming year may be more difficult for selling their produce. The constriction of FCI is likely to help private food grain buyers and doubling the farmers’ income may not be easy.
The Budget under the pressure of officials to adhere to fiscal deficit target has become an albatross for the common man. It looks more like a continuation of the harsh Manmohanomics. Taxes remain high, reliefs nil and available necessary facilities are charged whether in railways or income-tax.
Cafeteria approach of two rates for the income-tax – lower rate without discount and higher with existing discounts – has added to the confusion. It is not wise to deny the discount to the taxpayer. It is like a dosa being served but charging extra for the chutney. Certainly not wise accounting.
The Finance Minister should amend the proposal and offer the new I-T rates with discounts. Rather for a good economy, she may announce higher benefits for savers up to Rs 5 lakh a year. It would make banks healthy and higher savings would boost demand.
The Budget also disincentivizes savings, that too in a country which has a culture of family savings of 10 to 20 per cent a month. The FM may know that India grew on domestic savings till the ushering in of Manmohanomics in 1991.
Even BJP ideologue Deen Dayal Upadhyay has stressed on it. The banks, LIC and National Savings Organisation immensely contributed to the growth through such small contributions. Foregoing savings nobody rushes to the market to make purchases and boost manufacturing and industrial production.
Savings interest rate must be raised to 10 per cent. Almost six per cent fall in savings has hit the public sector banks hard calling for their repeated recapitalisation – paying from taxpayers’ money. This is certainly not desirable economics. Even for social security, people would have to make expensive purchases from insurance. And the harbinger of India’s growth since 1950s, the LIC is unwisely being privatised with dilution of its stake. Private insurers are thriving on defrauding the depositors. LIC has been built brick by brick by the people and should be left alone.
Reductions in corporate tax to 22 per cent and for new ones to 15 per cent are welcome. But ignoring the partnership firms, the informal sector that generates the maximum employment hits the poor. The FM says they need not have audit up to a turnover of Rs 5 crore from present Rs 1 crore. The caveat is they should not have more than 5 per cent or Rs 25 lakh income in cash.
The poor man thrives on cash and that is the fastest way to growth because every digital system has a cost and a middle man. The large companies may, and that is also a big if, thrive but at the cost of the marginalization of the poor for who DD Upadhyay toiled for in his antyoday concept. The FM may do a rethink.
The NRIs have been significantly contributing to growth as well as creating international prowess. The budget proposes to bring them under I-T net. This would hit NRI remittances as also forex reserves.
With all modes of transport air, water and road under private sector, she needs to leave the railways for the poor, as they don’t have many trains left to suit their pocket. With her proposal to privatise – making train fares expensive – 150 more trains, the poor would have little choice to travel with ease, a slogan FM repeats in the Budget. The Indian Railways is not in a poor financial state, but its accounting is. This needs urgent correction. There is no subsidy on railways and it is not in loss.
Similarly, the road sector is on a spree of levying extortive charges. The NHAI is not paying its contractors on time. How can it have a cash crunch when toll rates and other charges are the world’s highest? The total budgetary expenditure on road sector including PM gram sadak is less than that – Rs 1 lakh crore, earned through petrol cess of Rs 10 per litre. It needs to probe where the toll is going and who is benefitting. Road and rail travel has to be made people-friendly. Let people travel freely and add to the wealth of the country. High tolls, fees, charges and taxes are preventing the economy from being dynamic.
The famers’ assets, post note-ban, have crashed. No government has helped them. The packages announced are through bank credits. They need help. Let India not disincentivize cash economy. Europe is in ferment against banks and digital economy. Let India lead and not miss the bus. With a little touch there can be many winners and the flight to recovery may be as per FM’s aspiration without the path being wobbly. — INFA