Saturday, June 22, 2024
spot_img

‘We are in charge, can’t dictate on proceedings’: SC to SG during same sex marriage hearing

Date:

Share post:

spot_img
spot_img

New Delhi, April 18:  The Supreme Court on Tuesday told Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, that it is in charge of the hearing on petitions seeking legal sanction for same-sex marriages, after he insisted that it consider preliminary objections to the court deciding the petitions.

Mehta urged a five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud to consider the government’s preliminary objection to the court deciding the issue, which is essentially in Parliament’s domain.

The bench — also comprising Justices S.K. Kaul, S.R. Bhat, Hima Kohli, and P.S. Narasimha — said it will first hear petitioners’ and the nature and tenability of the preliminary objection will depend upon the canvas which the petitioners would open up.

The Chief Justice told Mehta: “I am sorry Mr. Solicitor, we are in charge. You cannot dictate how we will conduct the proceedings.”

“I have never allowed this in my court,” he added.

Emphasising that he never dictated to courts, Mehta said this is a sensitive issue, and “We may have to consider what would be the stand of the government on further participation in this debate”.

The bench told Mehta to trust it to have a broader perspective, and he said he trusts the court.

During the hearing, Mehta sought time to consider to what extent the government would like to participate in the matter. At this juncture, the bench asked: “Are you saying you do not want to participate?” Mehta said, “I will not go that far”, and clarified that he never meant that the government will not participate in the proceedings.

Mehta further argued that when the subject is on the concurrent list then in that case one state may favour it and another state disagree with it, cannot be ruled out and urged the court to involve states in the matter.

“None of us knows what are the views of a farmer in south India, a businessman in the north east. This will have social and other ramifications,” he argued.

After hearing Mehta’s submissions, the bench proceeded with hearing petitioners’ counsel in the matter.

IANS

spot_img
spot_img

Related articles

AMU Professor conducts faculty development programme at USTM

  Guwahati, June 22: A week-long Faculty Development Programme (FDP) on “Training on Application of SPSS for Data Analysis...

Assam’s grassroot conservation worker shares experiential knowledge in first IWEC

Guwahati, June 22: An experienced field staff of biodiversity conservation organisation Aaranyak, Dibakar Nayak who has been extensively...

NCPCR asks Meghalaya to provide benefits to physically challenged children

Shillong, June 22: The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) today asked Meghalaya Government to converge...

How Vadhavan port will put India on global map, generate lakhs of jobs

  Mumbai, June 22: The proposed mega Vadhavan port in the Palghar district of Maharashtra, worth Rs 76, 220...