By Our Reporter
SHILLONG, April 26: Citizens, including former bureaucrats and regular visitors, have voiced concerns over the growing misuse and commercialisation of Ward’s Lake by the state government in the name of promoting tourism.
Locally known as “Nan Polok” and considered one of Shillong’s most iconic green spaces, the Ward’s Lake has long served as a recreational hub for people seeking fresh air and respite from city life amid natural surroundings. However, a section of citizens observed that its character changed significantly after its management was shifted from the Forest and Environment Department to the Tourism Department.
Critics claim that under the present arrangement, the lake premises have been increasingly used as a venue for government-sponsored events, resulting in the deterioration of its environment and infrastructure. Visitors have pointed to declining cleanliness, with some alleging that even the lake water has become polluted.
There is also dissatisfaction over delays in restoring the lake’s iconic Japanese-style wooden bridge, once a central attraction, as well as the continued presence of temporary structures erected for past events. Citizens allege that such installations have not been cleared for extended periods, leaving the area cluttered and restricting free movement.
Former bureaucrat Toki Blah, who was among the first to raise objections, highlighted the historical significance of Ward’s Lake, noting that the site, developed in 1894 over more than five acres, was originally envisioned as a quiet recreational space for the people of Shillong. He said an artificial lake was created, fed by a canal system originating from Risa Colony and passing through Dhankheti and other areas before reaching the lake.
He further stated that the Forest Department maintained the lake for decades, preserving its environmental character, manicured lawns, flower beds and the distinctive Japanese-style bridge.
He expressed concern that recent developments have undermined these features, with bamboo scaffolding, plastic coverings and event-related debris replacing the once well-maintained landscape.
Questioning the current approach, Blah asked whether the original purpose of the lake as a public space for relaxation remains relevant today. He suggested that alternative venues, such as auditoriums or other government-owned spaces, could be used for hosting events instead of utilising a heritage site.
Echoing similar concerns, another former bureaucrat K.L. Tariang said that temporary structures for events are often left uncleared, leading to accumulation of waste and detracting from the lake’s natural charm. He emphasised that Ward’s Lake is not merely an event venue but a vital urban sanctuary offering calm and ecological balance within the city.
Another resident, H.T. Wells, described the lake as a place where visitors once found relief from daily stress. He expressed concern that increasing commercial activities are eroding the serenity of the area and affecting its ecological balance. He supported calls to restore the lake’s original character and suggested that its upkeep be entrusted back to the Forest Department.
Similarly, B. Dutta, a regular visitor, lamented the transformation of the lake into a “permanent exhibition site,” with frequent fairs and installations replacing lawns and flower beds. He raised concerns over structural changes, including covered boundary grills and altered entrances, stating that they have diminished the site’s heritage value.
He warned that unchecked commercialisation of public spaces could lead to irreversible loss of Shillong’s natural and cultural identity.
He pointed to broader concerns over urban development, including tree cutting, conversion of residential areas into commercial zones and neglect of heritage sites.
