Manipur’s anti-migrant bills battleground shifts to Delhi

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

New Delhi/Imphal: With the arrival of representatives of political parties from Manipur in New Delhi, the battleground for three contentious bills passed by the state assembly has shifted from Imphal to the national capital.
Minister of State for Home Kiren Rijiju assured the state BJP leaders from Manipur on Saturday night that if the three pending bills -aimed at regulating migrants — are not against any community in Manipur he would extend support to the bills.
The three legislative measures are awaiting presidential assent.
He told state Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) president Khetrimayum Bhabananda and others that several persons had come to him saying that the bills are against certain communities.
Meanwhile, an indefinite shutdown was enforced from Saturday midnight on the Singjamei side in Imphal West district.
Besides paralysing normal life, the shutdown also hit legalised border trade since the Trans Asian Highway No.1 passes through it.
Several women’s groups staged a sit-in protest demanding withdrawal of the “cooked up” charges against Khomdram Ratan, the former convenor of Joint Committee on Inner Line Permit System.
T. Sakhi, a woman activist said: “The government plan was to suppress the popular movement. However, the people’s agitation is going on in full swing even after Ratan’s resignation”.
The outlawed insurgent group, the United National Liberation Front of Manipur (UNLF), has clarified that Ratan is not its member. Publicity secretary M. Shakhen said: “The UNLF has no connection with the Inner Line Permit movement in Manipur. The objective of the UNLF has no connection with the protection of the indigenous peoples.”
The Manipur Tribals Forum Delhi also held a protest in Delhi coinciding with the camping of the political party delegates, who are seeking to meet central leaders in the national capital.
Manipur lawyers decry police action against
anti-migrant campaigner
The Manipur Police acted illegally in declaring anti-migrant campaigner Khomdram Ratan an “absconder” within hours of a supposedly incriminating picture appearing and when it could easily have arrested him, lawyers here said.
“It’s bizarre. While the police were issuing the public notice declaring him an absconder, he was very much in office addressing reporters and attending to official work. Where’s the question of absconding,” Khaidem Mani, a high court lawyer and former president of the All Manipur Bar Association, told IANS. He said Ratan has been booked as a criminal on the basis of a Facebook photograph which is a “mockery of law”.
The picture, which went viral on Wednesday, purportedly shows Ratan taking an oath of allegiance with the flag of the United National Liberation Front (UNLF), a banned insurgent group that has been fighting for an “independent” Manipur.
Ratan, who has been the convener of the Joint Committee on Inner Line Permit System (JCILPS), said on Friday that the picture was doctored and was meant to sabotage the movement for enactment of a constitutional safeguard for protection of the indigenous people of Manipur.
He said he never took part in any gathering where he held the UNLF’s flag and pledged allegiance to the outfit.
Ratan also resigned on Friday as the convener of JCILPS which has been demanding the enactment of three anti-migrant bills passed by the Manipur Assembly on August 31, 2015.
The police not only declared Ratan an absconder, but also announced a reward of Rs five lakh for information leading to his arrest.
Retired IPS officer and now high court lawyer Ahanthem Romenkumar said a Facebook picture cannot be the basis of filing a first information report (FIR).
“The Karnataka high court had quashed an FIR based on a Facebook photograph since the veracity of the picture could not be established,” Romenkumar said. “Besides in case of Ratan, police flouted procedures. At least two attempts should be made to arrest the accused. If they fail, the court should issue a public notice and 3 to 6 months should be given before declaring a person a proclaimed offender.” In Ratan’s case the matter was settled within 24 hours even though the accused was not fleeing the law but addressing press conferences, he said.
Many people are of the view that the intention of the government is not to arrest Ratan who is very much around but to deflect the anti-migrant campaign.
The JCILPS has been demanding an inner line permit (ILP) system for Manipur which has been encapsulated in the three anti-migrant bills passed by the Manipur assembly that now await presidential assent.
The ILP is a special permit required to enter certain restricted areas in the country. The system is already in place in Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and Mizoram. (IANS)

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

HC upholds EFI’s Asiad dressage selection

New Delhi, June 29: The Delhi High Court on Monday upheld the Equestrian Federation of India’s (EFI) selection...

Osaka Stuns Wimbledon Crowd

Japan’s Naomi Osaka walks into the court with a Japanese-inspired kimono-like robe to play against Elsa Jacquemot of...

Players at Wimbledon end protest over prize money

London, June 29: Top tennis players at Wimbledon have decided to end their protest over prize money and...

Sinner rallies to beat Kecmanovic in 5 sets in opener

LONDON, June 29: Defending champion Jannik Sinner had to come back from a set down twice and regain...