Nepal constitutional dispute grows over CJ nomination

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

KATHMANDU, May 10: Nepal’s government and judiciary are locked in a dispute after the Constitutional Council recommended Supreme Court Justice Manoj Sharma for appointment as Chief Justice, despite him ranking fourth in seniority. The recommendation was made on May 7 by a council headed by Prime Minister Balendra Shah, breaking Nepal’s long-standing tradition of appointing the senior-most Supreme Court judge to the post.
Acting Chief Justice Sapana Pradhan Malla strongly criticised the decision, warning that it reflects an attempt by the executive to influence and control the judiciary. Speaking on National Law Day, she stressed that judges must remain independent and not be pressured by political power or threats such as impeachment.
The government defended its choice, arguing that Sharma had delivered more verdicts than his seniors and demonstrated greater capability. However, critics rejected this reasoning, saying judicial quality and precedent are more important than quantity.
Former Chief Justice Sushila Karki also criticised the move, calling it a setback for judicial independence and women’s representation in top judicial leadership. Legal experts warned it could weaken the tradition of seniority-based appointments. (PTI)

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

World Cup Fuels Football Frenzy in Shillong

By Daniella Dawn Lyngwa In the hill city of Shillong, the FIFA World Cup is not just a global...

A Wild Success? Tracking a Decade of Rhino Reintroduction in Manas

Ten years of tracking reintroduced rhinos in Manas National Park of Assam has revealed a promising story of resilience and adaptation....

The watermelon

Thirteen-year-old George packed his favourite books, a fishing hat, and far too many socks before boarding the train...

Study reveals Vitamin D, Calcium may not protect against bone fractures

For years, many people have taken calcium and vitamin D supplements to help keep their bones strong as...