Sunday, February 25, 2024

British judge insists burqa-clad woman must show face


Share post:


London: A British judge has insisted that a burqa-clad woman must show her face in court to confirm her identity, saying the “principle of open justice” could not be subject to religion.

Judge Peter Murphy said he would not allow the 21-year-old defendant to stand trial in the veil, which only revealed her eyes, because a different person could go into the dock pretending to be her.

“It is necessary for this court to be satisfied that they can recognise the defendant. While I obviously respect the right to dress in any way she wishes, certainly while outside the court, the interests of justice are paramount,” he said.

During a hearing at Blackfriars Crown Court here on Thursday, Murphy said he could not accept a plea from a person whose identity he was unable to ascertain. He stressed that “the principle of open justice” could not be subject to the religion of the defendant.

“It would be easy for someone on a later occasion to appear and claim to be the defendant. The court would have no way to check on that,” he said.

According to The Daily Telegraph, the Muslim woman from Hackney in east London, whose identity cannot be revealed for legal reasons, says she cannot remove the veil in front of any men because of her religion.

She is facing an allegation of intimidating a witness in Finsbury Park, north London, in June. The woman’s barrister, Claire Burtwistle, told the court she was not prepared to lower her veil at all while men were in the courtroom. “In front of women, it is not an issue.

It is simply men that she will not allow to see her face,” she said. Burtwistle suggested that she, a female police officer or a female prison guard could identify the defendant and confirm to the court that it was the same person as in the police arrest photos.

Prosecutor Sarah Counsell said the police officer in charge of the case was content that he recognised the defendant while she was in the burqa. But the judge rejected these suggestions and adjourned the case till September 12, when the court will hear arguments over whether the woman should remove her veil. (PTI)


Related articles

Blaze wreaks havoc on Bar Association; valuable legal papers reduced to ashes

By Our Reporter SHILLONG, Feb 24: A massive fire blazed through the 111-year-old Assam-type structure housing the Shillong Bar...

We lost our office and memories today: Lawyers

By Our Reporter SHILLONG, Feb 24: City-based lawyers watched helplessly as towering flames consumed their place of employment and...

Govt earns over Rs 34 cr from coal auction in WKH

By Our Reporter SHILLONG, Feb 24: The state government has earned a revenue of over Rs 34.93 crore by...

KSU wants govt to ensure safety of border residents

By Our Reporter SHILLONG, Feb 24: The Khasi Students’ Union (KSU) on Sunday asked the Assam and Meghalaya governments...