Saturday, June 14, 2025
spot_img

Centre challenges SC interpretation of 102nd Constitutional Amendment

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

NEW DELHI, May 13: The Centre has filed a review petition in the Supreme Court in connection with its judgment conferring the President with the sole power for identification of a community as backward and its eligibility for reservation benefits.

The Centre has challenged the top court’s interpretation of 102nd Constitutional Amendment in the Maratha reservation judgment delivered on May 5. According to sources, the Centre’s petition has contended that state governments cannot be stripped their powers to identify socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC). The top court had upheld the 102nd Constitutional Amendment while denuding the power of states in this regard.

“By introduction of Articles 366 (26C) and 342A through the 102nd Constitution of India, the President alone, to the exclusion of all other authorities, is empowered to identify SEBCs and include them in a list to be published under Article 342A (1), which shall be deemed to include SEBCs in relation to each state and union territory for the purposes of the Constitution,” the top court had held.

Three of the five judges on the bench had held that 102nd Amendment has taken away the power of states to decide on SEBCs and only the President can take a decision in this matter.

However, the other judges have said that state governments can also identify SEBCs and there would be two lists – Central and state – of backward communities, which has been the practice for over six decades.

The top court had ruled that after the insertion of Article 342A in the Constitution through the 102nd Amendment, the Centre is empowered to identify SEBCs and include them in a list to be published under Article 342A (1), specifying SEBCs in relation to each state and Union Territory.

The Centre, through Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, had contended that 102nd Amendment does not take away states’ powers to identify SEBCs.

The top court verdict on May 5 had meant state governments will be restricted from making recommendations to the Centre favouring aspiring backwards.

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

Iran says next round of nuke talks with US ‘meaningless’

Tehran, June 14: Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei on Saturday announced that nuclear talks with the United...

NEET UG 2025 results: Mahesh Kumar tops exam with 686 marks

New Delhi, June 14: The National Testing Agency (NTA) has officially declared the results of the National Eligibility...

328 arms, 9,300 rounds of ammo recovered in Manipur by joint forces’ team

Imphal, June 14:  In a major development, the security forces in joint operations, have recovered 328 arms and...

US companies achieve record-breaking office leasing volumes in India: Report

Mumbai, June 14:  US firms have achieved record-breaking office leasing volumes in India in the past couple of...