Monday, March 31, 2025

SC rejects review pleas, reiterates ‘Quota within Quota’ permissible

Date:

Share post:

NEW DELHI, Oct 4: The Supreme Court has rejected a batch of pleas seeking review of its Constitution Bench judgment, which had held that sub-classification within Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) would be permissible for providing benefits of affirmative action.
After perusing the review petitions, a 7-judge Constitution Bench headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud said that “there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 has been established. The review petitions are, therefore, dismissed.”
In a landmark verdict delivered on August 1, the majority suggested the application of the “creamy layer” principle to the SCs and STs for availing quota benefits, but with a caveat that while providing for sub-classification, the government would not be entitled to reserve 100 per cent seats available for SCs/STs in favour of a particular sub-class to the exclusion of other castes in the List.In a 6:1 decision, it overturned its 2004 judgment, which had ruled against giving preferential treatment to certain sub-castes within SCs.
In his detailed opinion, Justice B.R. Gavai said, “When the 9-Judge Bench in Indra Sawhney held that applicability of such a test (creamy layer test) insofar asOBCs are concerned would advance equality as enshrined in the Constitution, then why such a test should not also be made applicable to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.”
“Can a child of IAS/IPS or Civil Service officers be equated with a child of a disadvantaged member belonging to Scheduled Castes, studying in a Gram Panchayat/Zilla Parishad school in a village?” Justice Gavai asked.
Justice Gavai’s opinion stressed that the government must evolve a policy for identifying the creamy layer even from the SCs and STs so as to exclude them from the benefit of affirmative action.In 2004, a 5-judge Constitution Bench in EV Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh case, which now stands overruled, had held that the members of the reserved category groups form a homogeneous class incapable of further regrouping or classification.
Days after the SC ruling in August this year, the Union Cabinet chaired by PM Modi held a detailed discussion on the top court’s judgment and said that no provision of the Constitution provided for “creamy layer” within SCs and STs quota. (IANS)

Related articles

IREDA records 27 per cent jump in loan sanctions to Rs 47,453 crore for FY 2024-25

New Delhi, March 31: The Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited (IREDA) on Monday reported 27 per cent...

J&K LG visits homes of 4 policemen martyred in Kathua anti-terrorist op

Jammu, March 31: Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) Lieutenant-Governor (LG), Manoj Sinha on Monday visited the families of the...

Delhi: Four Nigerians, aide held with Rs 27 cr drugs; HM Amit Shah lauds action

New Delhi, March 31:  Four Nigerians, along with an aide, were arrested and narcotics worth Rs 27 crore...

PA Sangma fought for rights of NE people: Meghalaya CM Sangma retorts to Biren Singh

Shillong/Imphal, March 31: Meghalaya Chief Minister, Conrad K. Sangma, on Monday said that late P.A. Sangma, former Union...