Brouhaha about heritage conservation at the cost of education
Editor,
The recent demolition of the Don Bosco Technical School building has ignited a contentious debate. As I reflect on this issue, I am compelled to express my concerns and pose poignant questions.
The edifice, erected in 1949, which serves as the LP section of St. Anthony’s School Shillong as on date has contributed substantially to the state’s education sector. The first batch of students commenced classes in 1952, marking the inception of a legacy that has shaped numerous lives. At the time of demolition, the building stood at 72 years old.
Regrettably, the structure’s wear and tear had raised anxieties about the safety of students. Parents had vociferously expressed their concerns to the management, prompting the need for a new, state-of-the-art facility. The management’s decision to demolish the old building was driven by an unwavering commitment to provide a better learning environment, replete with modern facilities and expansive classrooms.
While some have advocated for the building’s designation as a heritage site, I am compelled to inquire: Does the building genuinely meet the criteria for heritage status under the Meghalaya Heritage Act, 2012? The Act stipulates that heritage buildings are those that necessitate conservation or preservation for historical, architectural, artistic, or cultural purposes.
I pose a poignant question to those who champion the cause of heritage status: Are the interests of a select few being prioritized over the safety, security, and educational well-being of the students? Is it prudent to compromise the learning environment and jeopardize the future of these young minds for the sake of preserving a structure that, albeit historic, had become increasingly decrepit?
Furthermore, I am dismayed by the notion that this issue has been framed as a matter of public interest. Whose interests are being served by advocating for the preservation of a building that no longer serves the needs of its primary stakeholders – the students?
Ultimately, I implore those who have been vocal about this issue to consider the human cost of their advocacy. Who will assume responsibility for the students’ education and well-being if the school is forced to maintain a structure that is no longer fit for purpose?
As we navigate this complex issue, let us not lose sight of the paramount importance of providing a safe, nurturing, and conducive learning environment for our children.
Yours etc.,
Rupert Lyngdoh,
ex-student,
Via email
Time to get out of victimhood syndrome
Editor,
The editorial “Elections Amplify Victimhood Syndrome.” (ST February 15, 2025) is timely and appropriate. When elections amplify a victimhood syndrome, it can have several negative consequences for society and the political landscape. Emphasizing victimhood can deepen societal divisions, creating an “us vs. them” mentality. This can lead to increased hostility between different groups and make finding common ground more challenging. Constantly portraying certain groups as victims can undermine trust in political institutions, the media and other public entities. People may start to believe that the system is inherently biased against them. Politicians may exploit feelings of victimhood to gain support, using emotional appeals rather than focusing on concrete policy solutions. This can lead to a lack of substantive debate and a focus on grievance politics.
When victimhood narratives dominate, it can prevent constructive dialogue and problem-solving. Instead of working together to address issues, differences may become entrenched in their positions. Leaders who use victimhood narratives to their advantage can gain power by promising to “fight for the oppressed” without offering realistic solutions. This can lead to the rise of populist leaders who may undermine democratic norms and institutions. By framing themselves or their supporters as victims, politicians can deflect criticism and avoid accountability for their actions. This can lead to a lack of transparency and reduced government accountability. Constant exposure to victimhood narratives can affect the mental health of individuals, leading to feelings of helplessness, anger and resentment. To mitigate these effects, it’s essential to promote informed and balanced political discourse. Encouraging critical thinking, fact-checking and focusing on policy-based discussions can help create a healthier political environment.
Further, when no one dares to call out lies during an election campaign, several negative consequences can occur. The electorate may make decisions based on false information leading to voting choices that do not reflect their true interests or values. Trust in the political system and democratic processes can erode if lies are perceived as the norm. Politicians who are not held accountable for their false statements may feel emboldened to continue misleading the public. Policies based on falsehoods can be implemented, potentially causing harm to the public and the economy.
Misinformation can deepen divisions within society, pitting different groups against each other based on false narratives. The political landscape can become more polarised, making it difficult to find common ground and achieve bipartisan solutions. The media’s role as a watchdog is undermined if lies are not challenged, leading to questions about journalistic integrity. Public discourse as the quality of information disseminated declines. The foundation of democracy relies on informed and rational debate. When lies go unchallenged, democratic norms and values are weakened. Disillusionment with the political process can lead to voter apathy and lower participation in elections.
To mitigate these issues, it is essential to promote fact-checking, encourage media literacy and hold politicians accountable for their statements through public discourse and legal mechanisms. Engaged citizens and a vigilant media are critical in ensuring the integrity of the democratic process.
Yours etc;
VK Lyngdoh
Via email
Gratitude to Meghalaya Fire & Emergency Services
Editor,
There was a fire incident at our premises, Lifeline Enterprises, Joavan Towers, G.S.Road, Shillong on February 10, 2025 at around 11.15 am.
We would like to express our gratitude to Meghalaya Fire and Emergency Services for the prompt action taken by them in extinguishing it, and stopping it from spreading further, and thereby limiting the loss for us and our neighbours. We would like to put on record that the Fire personnel reacted in a very professional manner and ensured that minimum damage occurred.
We are eternally grateful to them and their team.
Yours etc.,
Anuj Bawri
Via email
Letters to the Editor must have the full name, address and contact number of the writer, even if they are sent by email. Only letters with the requisite details will be published.