Editor,
In response to the letter, “Unfair Recruitment Process,’ appearing in the Letters to the Editor column (ST May 23, 2025), we refute the allegations as follows:
1. Advertisements for the written test were published in two local papers, The Shillong Times and U Mawphor, both dated January 16, 2025, besides being posted in the Bank’s website. Candidates were also intimated through their mobiles.
2. The fees taken do not even cover the cost of expenditure.
3. That out of 4,185 candidates who applied, only 933 appeared is a loss to the Bank as it is deprived of a larger competition that would unearth higher quality.
4. The written test was conducted by an outside professionally reputed source.
5. The use of pencil was advised as the candidate could rub off his mark if he/she wants to do corrections.
6. There are six (6) posts to be filled up, but in a phased manner. The first two are called to fill the two vacancies immediately. The next four will be filled up soon after. The list of 22 other candidates will be kept valid for 3 years and will be absorbed by the Bank as and when and if required.
7. The viva-voce was conducted by a panel of three whose integrity, transparency, and moral character is beyond reproach.
8. To say that the recruitment process reeks of favouritism and nepotism is totally unacceptable and unjustified.
9. The accusations of the aggrieved candidate are understandable as he/she is desperate for a job as also the many thousands of unemployed youths. However, the aggrieved candidate should ascertain the facts before any accusation is made, damaging the goodwill and reputation of the Bank.
10. The policy of the Bank is to be fair, transparent, and maintain high moral standards. Casting aspersions without facts is slanderous and objectionable and is not the attitude of a right thinking and responsible person who would not hide behind a wall and throw stones.
Yours etc.,
CEO, The Shillong Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd
Shillong – 1
Disappointing after-sales experience with Tiago EV dealership
Editor,
I wish to share my experience regarding the purchase of a Tiago EV from Frank Tata Motors dealership at Mawblei, Shillong in 2024. While I am genuinely delighted with the vehicle’s performance and the quality of the car and the brand overall—truly an excellent vehicle—the service and communication from the dealership have been disappointing.
At the time of purchase, the salesperson assured me that the government subsidy for the EV would be processed and disbursed within two months. Unfortunately, it has now been over a year, and I have yet to receive any subsidy. Despite numerous follow-ups, I have received only vague and evasive responses, with no clear explanation or resolution from the dealership.
Additionally, I was never informed about the due date for my vehicle’s insurance premium. Consequently, I missed the payment deadline, leading to unnecessary inconvenience and potential financial risk. I had expected the dealership to notify me of such critical dates or provide proper documentation to ensure I was aware; sadly, that did not happen.
The overall experience has been extremely frustrating. Both the local showroom and the company’s head office have ignored my attempts to address these issues. Since I am currently out of the country, actively pursuing this matter has become challenging. I can only describe the initial sales pitch as snake oil, promising much but delivering little, and I find the after-sales service to be utterly poor, which has unfortunately diminished my interest in owning the car.
I am seeking the opinions of your esteemed readers on possible recourse or actions I could take to recover my money. Your advice will be greatly valued, as I feel left stranded and unfairly treated in this entire ordeal.
Yours etc.,
P. Sawian
Via email
Concerns of a pedestrian
Editor,
Through your esteemed daily, I would like to share some experiences and concerns I’ve come across while walking through the streets of Shillong. As someone who often walks from home to work and back, I find walking not only a way to avoid traffic but also a healthy habit. However, there are certain things on the streets that truly bother me, and I believe the public and authorities should take note.
First, smoking in public is a big concern. Many people smoke openly and blow out smoke without caring about those around them. I have no issue with people choosing to smoke, but doing it in public spaces shows a lack of civic sense. It forces others to become passive smokers and risks their health. Second, there are individuals who stop passersby to preach or share religious messages. While their intention might be good, their approach is often too forceful. Some even pretend to pray for you and then ask for money. Faith is personal, and people should not be pressured in public spaces. Third, there are groups of two-wheeler riders offering Rapido-like services, but many of them charge unfairly high fares, especially from those who are new or unaware. They often disturb walkers by repeatedly asking if they need a ride. Fourth, the issue of stray dogs is real. In the early morning and late evening, these dogs can be a threat to joggers and walkers.
Lastly, many footpaths get waterlogged even after a light rain. This shows poor planning and construction. It makes walking difficult and unpleasant. These are just some of my personal experiences. I am sure there are more issues that others could add. I sincerely hope the concerned authorities take a closer look and make the streets safer and more pleasant for everyone together with the jacaranda flowers that paint the streets purple.
Yours etc.,
Zeppuh Gangmei
Shillong-3