Friday, May 16, 2025
spot_img
Home Blog Page 19295

Is there hope for Meghalaya?

Editor,

In spite of the expectations of the people for a better future, it seems we are heading for the usual post election scenario. As in the past, it looks like we will again have a coalition government. With the coalition government will come the usual lack of transparency and accountability. This situation benefits politicians who will get authority without responsibility, but it will definitely play havoc on good governance.

The last year, we have seen positive signs from the Mukul Sangma government. Dr Sangma has been doing and saying the right things, thereby positively catching the attention of the common people. Unfortunately, his own Congress party has not invested in his Chief Ministership and has, instead, continued with it’s well honed “divide and rule” policy. If only they had placed their faith on Dr Mukul and allowed him to pick his candidates for the sake of stability and good governance post election! Instead, it is reported that they have asked Messrs Lapang and Pala to take charge of the Khasi and Jaintia Hills sector, while Dr Sangma was asked to look after Garo Hills. This paves the way for a leadership struggle within the Congress, post election, which will lead to instability. The ultimate gainers will be the AICC representatives while the ultimate victims will be good governance and, of course, the people.

There has been a lot of dissatisfaction with the Congress, but unfortunately the other parties have chosen to play second fiddle to the Congress. Instead of reinventing themselves and sacrificing for the people by going in for a pre-poll alliance, they are content with looking to gain only from the mistakes of the Congress. After the election, they will fight with each other to support the Congress and be a part of the coalition. Then, throughout the term there will be no opposition in case the opportunity to be with the government comes their way. At the end of the day, the role of the opposition will have to be again played by pressure groups like the KSU, FKJGP, CSWO, ANVC, etc.

So what can the people do in order to get good governance? I guess they can only look to choose wisely for themselves. Let the people not be fooled by monetary incentives or electoral platitudes. Let them choose people with integrity, who are willing to commit on transparency and accountability, as their representatives. Then hope that the character of the people they have chosen will give them stability and good governance for the next five years. I urge the people of the State to reject all tainted candidates, otherwise the frustration will build up, and we know how that frustration can get expressed.

I sincerely pray that God may bless and protect our State and it’s people.

Yours etc.,

R G Lyngdoh.

Via email

Who do we choose?

Editor,

With elections just round the corner, prospective candidates are already at work. Election campaigns are doing the rounds, false promises are made and the humility to reach even the downtrodden is in full display. As has been practised in the past, money power will again throw its weight. Well, who does not need money? The haves want more while the have-nots always feel its need. Therefore we have contenders who are ready to shed money now to secure a win as they will retrieve it manifold once they are elected. On the other hand the poor who are always left in the lurch and are in need of the means to help at least ease their temporary miseries will accept every token of help. Sometimes, especially in the villages, people are so struck by conscience that they feel obliged to cast their votes for the one who meets their needs, although at times they are aware that the candidate does not really care about them but is only conspiring to prosper himself/herself. Of course there are smart voters too who will not shy away from asking or taking what is being offered to them but will vote for a candidate of their choice. Election is an interesting dice game that the candidates and the voters play with or against one another.

I would like to exhort especially the educated lot to vote wisely and conscientiously. But sadly we tend to suffer from dementia or short memory loss. Come election time and we slip on the false promises that politicians make and forget the scams that come along with the candidate. But can we afford to still make the same mistake and vote for the one who had let us down? Should they be given more chances to commit more malpractices?

Another interesting point emerging from the younger generation baffles me. Slogans like “Exercise your voting rights” “Make the right choice” etc are heard and seen everywhere. But is there really a choice? What do voters choose from when most of the candidates are unfit and unqualified? The young want to exercise their rights (especially first timers) but can they simply vote for anyone who does not meet their expectations? We have educated and conscientious young minds that are aware of what is right and what is wrong so we hope for a better tomorrow. Perhaps the Constitution needs constructive amendments to include educational qualifications and retirement age for candidates so as to discourage any Tom, Dick and Harry loaded with money from simply jumping into the fray. At the risk of sounding cynical one sees a very bleak outcome out of this 2013 election.

Yours etc.,

Jenniefer Dkhar,

Via email

Crime and punishment

0

Public memory is proverbially short. But the gang rapes in Delhi and elsewhere in India have not been forgotten. What is reassuring is that crime against women in the country is now receiving the attention it demands. Strict penalties are being thought of. The Justice Verma Committee is finalizing its suggestions. The sexual assault bill is being made more comprehensive. The Union Home Ministry is mulling over amending the criminal law bill to include stalking and sexual harassment. So far these have been bailable offences, lightly punished under Sections 354 and 509. Stalking and intimidation of women have so far been treated as minor threats to their privacy and security. Women are reluctant to report such cases as the police are likely to brush them aside. Women have to put up with eve-teasing or street sexual harassment without complaining. In any case, the criminals are let off lightly if their offences are reported.

At the same time, the consequences of every step forward have to be carefully examined. What will be the effect or making sexual harassment and stalking non-bailable offences? Evidence is tampered with and the offenders get off scot free. It is necessary to have a sense of proportion; rape cannot be put in the same category as cat calls. Fast-track courts should definitely take prompt action in cases of sexual violence. But they should not be allowed to encroach on constitutional rights and hasty verdicts should be avoided. Justice is of course the paramount need. But it should not be vitiated by unnecessary speed. Rape, however,is an exception and here there can be no forgiveness.

Assert but also introspect

Pak’s Barbaric Act

By Col (Dr) PK Vasudeva (Retd)

Notwithstanding the flag meeting between army commanders of India and Pakistan to de-escalate the tension along the Line of Control (LoC), attempts to improve relations between the neighbours have taken a severe beating. The barbaric beheading of an Indian soldier and mutilation of another’s body by the Pakistani Army should be viewed as a clear attempt by the establishment in Islamabad to destabilise the decade-old ceasefire and dislodge the peace process. More so, at a time when the ties were beginning to improve after the enormous damage done by 26/11 attacks.

While vested interests in Pakistan are doing their utmost to derail the dialogue, New Delhi too needs to get its act together and send strong signals that its patience is running out. Not only is the dastardly act by the Pakistani Army most shocking but a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions. Other than its neighbour, New Delhi must raise it at appropriate international fora to expose Pakistan for its inhuman activities against soldiers.

However, it must tread cautiously on Pakistan’s offer to let the UN probe the brutal killings in Mendhar in Jammu and Kashmir. It is a clever diplomatic ploy—a part of Islamabad’s deep-rooted strategy to internationalise the Kashmir issue. Beginning this year, Pakistan assumed rotational presidency of the UN Security Council. It has been planning special sessions on peacekeeping and counter-terrorism, and its offer for a UN probe should be seen as leveraging its position as the Council chair, where the LoC incident can be used to its advantage. Islamabad could press for a discussion on the issue to embarrass India, and the incident could be a good trigger.

This apart, with elections due in Pakistan, it suits the political leadership to play up the K issue. Diplomatic sources indicate that for many years India has resisted Islamabad’s attempts to use the world forum to raise the Kashmir issue, and by letting a UN probe in the case it would eventually give sanctity to its role in the whole process.

While Islamabad has stated that it was prepared to hold investigations through the UN Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP), which has a presence on both sides of the LoC, India is firm there is no UN role, and even the UNMOGIP, has only a symbolic presence. Importantly, New Delhi does not consider their reports or assessments.

Undeniably, Pakistan army’s depravity has sunk to a new low, with the latest incident of beheading and mutilation. Soldiers kill and get killed but what makes these killings particularly disturbing and deplorable is the beastly manner in which they were carried out by the Pakistani army. This is not the way a professional army conducts itself, certainly not one that is a party to a ceasefire agreement. Recall, that an Indian soldier Capt Saurabh Kalia was brutally tortured and killed while in captivity during the Kargil conflict. It was believed then that ‘irregulars’ mutilated his body, although subsequent reports pointed to the complicity of the Pakistan military.

While the depravity of the Pakistani army is of concern to New Delhi, this should worry more the Pakistani government and its people. However, their silence is eerie. So far Islamabad has been in a denial mode, while the media and civil society have avoided asking questions. Unfortunately, this will only embolden the military.

Further, there are close links between the military, the Taliban and other extremist outfits that indulge in beheading, as also the growing radicalisation of army officers and lower ranks. It does seem now that elements in the Pakistan military have become ‘Talibanised,’ infected not just by the medieval ideology of the Taliban but by its barbaric methods as well.

New Delhi must not only robustly raise its concerns to the Pakistani government but must stress that such conduct of its Army will have its costs. It must assert that there are red lines, which if breached by Islamabad, would force India to act. It would need to adopt a carefully calibrated approach to Pakistan’s barbarism. Short of military action, there are several options available, if it wants to pressurise Islamabad and New Delhi must explore these. Air Chief Marshal NAK Browne’s comment that the country might have to look at “some other options for compliance” is well taken.

At the same time, Delhi should utilise the reactions that are coming in. For one, the US State Department has expressed concern and stated: “We urge both sides to take steps to end exchanges of fire and to resume normal trade and travel across the line of control.” It must also pay heed to J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah’s tweet:… Clearly someone up the chain of command wants to do everything to derail any dialogue between the two countries….That having been said ceasefire must hold else infiltration will shoot up manifold under cover provided by firing.”

This apart, it is essential that India looks within its system. It must introspect as to why Indian soldiers get killed when it has the latest man packed radars, which can detect the enemy in bad foggy weather from a distance of over 500 meters. Additionally, it must accept the fact that the main cause of our failure at the LoC is that we do not have junior leaders – Lieutenants, Captains and Majors to lead the troops.

Regrettably, the Indian Army is facing a peculiar problem – not enough youngsters are attracted to join the 1.1-million strong force as officers. Expressing concern at the situation, Army Chief General Bikram Singh, has stated that about 10,500 officers are needed. The shortage, he admitted, was impacting the officer-jawan relationship. According to official figures, the shortage is around 10,500 in the Army, 1,400 in the Navy and 1,100 in the Air Force.

Therefore, our political leadership must wake up and make the Armed Forces’ service conditions more attractive so that the youth join the forces as their first priority. Otherwise we shall have many more such debacles in the face of the enemy and suffer humiliation. How can the soldier fight wars without the junior leadership, which is the backbone of all success? It is well-known that wars are won by the soldiers and not by Generals.

Worse, there does not seem to be any dialogue between the top Army brass and the political leadership on strategic issues. One is surprised to learn that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was briefed about the gruesome LoC incident by National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon and Defence Secretary Shashi Kant Sharma and not by the Chairman of Chiefs of Staff Committee. How are bureaucrats better versed with security issues than the Services chiefs, who are responsible for the national security and integrity of the country?

Earlier, the Service chiefs had always been invited at the meetings of the Cabinet Committee on Security for advice and strategic planning. The chiefs preferably (Chief of the Defence Staff as and when appointed) must be involved at the decision-making level on national security issues. Sadly, there is a clear disconnect between the political and military leadership. Let us not waste any more time to make necessary amends. (INFA)

Tensions mount among warring Congressmen over Telangana

By S Sethuraman

The stage is being set for what looks like a ‘Sonia Gift’ of Telengana by January 28, in a political gamble to salvage as many Lok Sabha seats as possible for the Congress in 2014 Lok Sabha polls, even in a truncated Andhra Pradesh, now no longer its stronghold. The desperate move is designed mainly to counter the perceived challenge of YSR Congress of imprisoned Mr Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy, MP, who commands a considerable following in Rayalaseema and Coastal districts.

While Telengana activists have planned a “Maha Parighatna” after June 28, if by chance the Centre does not announce a bifurcation with Hyderabad as capital of the new state, the Seemandhra Congress leaders, stoutly opposed to disintegration, have warned the Central leaders of a violent backlash in the rest of Andhra Pradesh.

Forces of law and order have already been alerted by the Central and State Governments to maintain peace following an announcement on the future of Andhra Pradesh, in order to forestall a possible re-run of widespread violence and disorder that followed a hasty, ill-conceived pronouncement in favour of Telengana on December 9, 2009, by the then Home Minister Mr Chidambaram.

Telengana looms large in the ‘Chintan Shivir’ on January 18 and 19 at Jaipur where the top Congress leaders will go through an agonising reappraisal of where the ruling party at the Centre stands ahead of 2014 elections, after UPA’s governance failures and electoral setbacks over the last three and a half years. The emerging prospects for the Congress in different states with or without alliances will be assessed with the countdown for 2014 having begun.

The Seemandhra leaders who had converged in Delhi were reportedly asked by one of the AICC leaders in charge of Andhra affairs as to how many Lok Sabha seats they could promise if there is no bifurcation while Telengana Congress had promised 16 out of 17 seats there. But the confidence of Seemandhra leaders to win “sufficient number” of seats was not shared by AICC spokesmen. These leaders would get back to Delhi to reiterate their opposition to the break-up of a united Andhra Pradesh. They are undecided about future course of action.

Chief Minister Mr Kiran Kumar Reddy, who has been actively touring the state and launching a series of new schemes including food security and right to services — the first of its kind at state level – is also strengthening his governance and is even more confident that the Congress would gain absolute majority in the 2014 elections, whatever the decisions that are taken vis-à-vis Telengana. Increasingly, he has been relied upon by the central leadership and is no longer dubbed as an under-achiever. Mr K K Reddy has been made an active participant in the ongoing discussions in New Delhi both over the future of the state and on tiding over any threats to law and order in the wake of whatever decision is finally announced.

The Congress Core Committee, which has held a series of meetings is yet to give final shape to a Telengana announcement and questions remain whether it would become a full-fledged state, whether Hyderabad would be made a Union Territory and/or a shared capital for Telengana and rest of Andhra Pradesh. One move was also on inclusion of Kadapa district in Telengana in order to limit Mr Jaganmohan Reddy’s influence over the region.

Mr Jaganmohan Reddy remains in jail since May 2012 with a series of cases of illegal accumulation of wealth foisted on him by CBI and his remand in custody has been repeatedly extended before trial could begin. That has made no difference to his popularity among the people with YSR Congress currently headed by Ms. Y S Vijayamma, wife of late Chief Minister.

In 2014 Lok Sabha elections, the Congress which secured 33 Lok Sabha seats in 2009 LS elections, the highest for any state, will have to battle hard in a salvage operation in order to be able to retain power in the State and bag the maximum possible number of seats at the Centre. While it may be confident of a majority in Telengana if it is decided finally to bifurcate AP, the Congress will be up against both the powerful YSR Congress as well as Mr Chandrababu Naidu’s Telugu Desam (TDP) in Rayalaseema and Coastal regions. And both these parties may gain in strength if unhappy Seemandhra Congress MLAs walk over to either of them.

Mr Chandrababu Naidu, leader of the TDP opposition in the Assembly, has been on a ‘padayatra’ since October 2 and hopes his party’s declared support for Telengana would keep TDP in the region safe. His party, which ruled the state for some years, has a wider base and Mr Naidu, who earned reputation as a reformer in office, is desperately struggling to come back to power. Mr Naidu has been making extravagant offers of free power, write-off of farmers loans, and all kinds of welfare schemes.

Mr Naidu would have covered the entire state in a three-month-long walking tour and hopes to galvanise mass support for a TDP resurgence and majority to replace the Congress in office. From his jail, Mr Jaganmohan Reddy has wielded influence over several Ministers and MLAs who are transferring their allegiance to YSR Congress. The party president Ms. Vijayamma asserts her son, Mr Jaganmohan Reddy would come to power through a popular mandate and she is also confident of his coming out of jail disproving the charges against him For their part, Telengana activists have been in the forefront of the struggle for a separate state with Hyderabad as capital. Mr K Chandrasekhar Rao M P, leading the Telengana Rashtra Samiti (TRS), had recently promised a merger of his party with the Congress if their demand is conceded and that would give the Congress a sweeping majority in Telengana. He seems to be happy with the news emanating from Delhi but if Congress backtrack, he warns, his party would capture the maximum number of Assembly and Lok Sabha seats in 2014 and make Telengana a “reality”. An ideal solution for the Congress would be one that seeks to balance the interests of both separatists and integrationists but it would be a tall order at present. Tension-filled Andhra Pradesh now awaits a formal announcement of what appears to have been decided upon in regard to formation of Telengana and that could become a signal for a fresh round of disturbances. To the extent such a decision is coupled with reassurances on an undisturbed status of Hyderabad, which the Centre can rightly demand of, and expect accommodation by, separatists, it might help to calm tempers down. (IPA Service)

England need to find a way to stop the Indian skipper

0

By Ian Botham

It was very important in the series’ perspective for India to come strong and level it in Kochi and that’s what they have done. The total put up by India could have been chased but the England batsman didn’t play well and made it look much more tough than it was.

For any team and any format, the success of the top order stands vital and that has been a concern for India. Especially in the limited-overs game, it’s easy to bat at the top with the field restrictions and the new ball coming on to the bat. India can’t rely all the time on MS Dhoni to come and finish games. Had Dhoni and Ravindra Jadeja not put up the stand at the end, it could have been a different story. The top order need to make themselves count.

Dhoni is one of the most dangerous cricketers around. He is a terrific cricketer and England need to find a way to stop the Indian captain. What is impressive is the fact that he is under so much pressure but he has still come out strong and leads from the front with performance.

Today’s match is in Ranchi, the hometown of Dhoni, and the team will have tremendous support. I think the smaller zones are the way to go for limited-overs cricket. The Kochi crowd was amazing and so was Rajkot. The support has been great to watch.

The new rule has drawn criticism from a few captains as they feel spinners are facing the wrath but I am fine with it. What the new format has done is made captains think and strategize more and it has been good to watch from the viewers’ perspective.

India with the win under the belt and playing in their captain’s backyard, will stand favourites but don’t be surprised if England come back strong as that’s what they have done throughout the season. Haven’t they?

Dhoni plays ‘host’ in 3rd ODI today

0

Ranchi: India skipper MS Dhoni survived an injury scare on Friday when a rising delivery hit his right thumb during the team’s practice session on the eve of the third one-dayer against England here.

However, the team management said he was fit and there was no danger to Dhoni, who is all set to lead Team India at his home ground amidst the local fans, who are eagerly waiting to see the city’s favourite son in action on Saturday.

“He is perfectly alright. He does not even need to have an X-ray, scan or anything. There is no danger at all,” Satish, Indian team manager (logistics), told reporters.

The World Cup-winning skipper has an aura about himself in these parts, what Sourav Ganguly has in Kolkata.

Even an excited Dhoni has said he was looking forward to play at home, as there is little doubt over his availibility for the game.

“200 per cent I’m looking forward to it (playing at home). It’s a big thing for me,” the Ranchi-born wicketkeeper batsman, who has so far played 216 ODIs since making his debut in 2004 in Bangladesh, had said after their series levelling (1-1) victory in Kochi.

All-rounder Ravindra Jadeja, who played a crucial role in India’s series-levelling win in Kochi said that the hosts are keen to carry forward the momentum and take a 2-1 lead in the third ODI.

“We are very happy with the way we won our last match. We just hope to carry forward the winning momentum and looking forward to win the game.

“We hope to do right things. We are very positive,” Jadeja said.

Refusing to read too much into the slump in form of Virat Kohli, Jadeja said it was a part and parcel of every cricketer’s life.

“I don’t think it’s a worry. Virat is doing well for quite a long time. It happens in every cricketers’ life when you go through ups and downs. No doubt, if he does well the confidence of the team goes high,” said Jadeja. (PTI)

Immune to Venom, Nongthymmai win

0

SHILLONG: Nongthymmai defeated Venom Speed by 19 runs in their First Division match of the Shillong Cricket League at Polo Grounds.

Venom Speed won the toss and elected to field first. Nongthymmai then scored 123 runs all out in 27.3 overs. Ranjiv Rai scored 25, while Prakash took 3-15.

In reply, Venom Speed were dismissed for 104 runs in 33.2 overs. Chandru scored 32 while Burt claimed three wickets for just eight runs.

Meanwhile, in the B Division, Young Guns defeated Youth Club by 43 runs.

Batting first, Young Guns put up a formidable total of 177-8 in 20 overs. Viru scored a half-century. Youth Club were then restricted to 134 all out. Robin scored 33, while Manish and Sameer took two wickets each.

In the second game Helping Hands defeated Bigvory by six wickets. Batting first, Bigvory were shot out for a lowly 42 runs in 11 overs. Sanjeev took four wickets.

In reply, Helping Hands completed the chase in only nine overs, although they lost four wickets in the process.

South West Khasi Hills competition concludes

0

SHILLONG: The South West Khasi Hills District Level Open Sports Competition, as part of the state government’s Year of the Youth 2012-2013, conducted in Mawkyrwat in six different disciplines, concluded on Thursday.

The events included a half marathon (21km), 5km and 3km road race, archery, basketball, volleyball, badminton and carrom spread over three days.

Aldous Mawlong, Deputy Commisioner of South West Khasi Hills District, flagged off the half marathon.

The closing function was held at the Indoor Stadium, Mawkyrwat, and Raja Brahma, EAC South West Khasi Hills District distributed the prizes to the winners of the different sporting disciplines.

The winners in the various sports were as follows:

Boys half marathon – Jomingstar Ramsiej (Sakwang); girls half marathon – Kyntimon Marwein (Mawlangwir).

Boys 5km – Stilin Jyrwa (Jakrem); girls 5km – Kyntihun Syiemlieh (Sakwang).

Boys 3km – Wanboklang Jyrwa (Jakrem); girls 3km – Laenbok Ramsiej (Sakwang).

Badminton boys singles – Jeffry Kupar Snaitang (Mawkyrwat); girls singles – Sess Memory Lyngdoh (Mawten); boys doubles – Taidystar Wahlang and Jeffry Kupar (Mawkyrwat); girls doubles – Badapbiang Lyngkhoi and Badashisha Snaitang (Mawkyrwat); Taidystar Wahlang and Badapbiang Lyngkhoi (Mawkyrwat).

Boys basketball – Mawten SC; girls basketball Mawlangwir SC.

Boys volleyball – Nongam SC; girls volleyball – Mawten SC.

Traditional archery (individual) – Commander Snaitang (Tynnai); (team event) – Pynshai Kharbuki and Elisha Marwein (Mawlangwir).

Modern archery (30m) – Khrawhor Banshan Lyngdoh (Wahsiej); (20m) – Pyngshngainborlang Wanniang (Wahsiej).

Overall boys archery (20 + 30m) Pynshngainborlang Wanniang (Wahsiej).

20m individual ranking – Peacenia Wanniang (Mawlangwir).

Boys carrom – Renly Wanchan (Mawkyrwat); girls carrom – Maisydora Lyngdoh (Mawlangwir).

Djokovic, Sharapova breeze through in Melbourne

0

MELBOURNE: A welcome wind blew away the stifling heat at Melbourne Park on Friday but there was no diverting Novak Djokovic or Maria Sharapova from their paths to the last 16 of the Australian Open on day five.

Djokovic marched into the fourth round without giving up a set after successfully negotiating a tricky tie against Radek Stepanek with a 6-4, 6-3, 7-5 win.

Sharapova was even more impressive and, although denied a third successive 6-0, 6-0 win of the week, looked every inch the title contender in her 6-1, 6-3 demolition of seven-time grand slam champion Venus Williams.

Fourth seed Agnieszka Radwanska also continued her red-hot start to the year, notching up win number 12 with a 6-3, 6-1 victory over Britain’s Heather Watson in their third round tie.

Djokovic had to work for every point against Stepanek, who charged the net 67 times.

It was little more than a good workout for the world number one, however.

Sharapova’s flurry of fist pumps after she wound up her match against Williams showed how much the victory meant to the second seed, who has been in ruthless form this week despite missing her one warm-up tournament with a collar-bone injury.

David Ferrer eased further into it with a 6-4, 6-2, 6-3 win over another entertainer, 2006 finalist Marcos Baghdatis.

The Spanish baseliner showed more than a few decent touches of his own – most notably a sumptuous backhand lob – as he set up a fourth-round contest against Japan’s Kei Nishikori.

Big-serving Tomas Berdych was a 6-3, 6-2, 6-2 winner over Jurgen Melzer and will face Kevin Anderson in the next round with a likely quarterfinal meeting with Djokovic on the line.

Djokovic must first get past Swiss Stanislas Wawrinka, who ended the 2013 challenge of the American men at Melbourne Park when he beat Sam Querrey 7-6, 7-5, 6-4.

Eighth seed Janko Tipsarevic outlasted Frenchman Julien Benneteau 3-6, 6-4, 2-6, 6-4, 6-3 in a second successive five-set match.

The Serbian will next face Spanish 10th seed Nicolas Almagro, who ended Jerzy Janowicz’s Australian Open with a 7-6, 7-6, 6-1 win.

Ana Ivanovic won the battle against Jelena Jankovic 7-5, 6-3 and was later joined in the fourth round by Li Na, who beat Sorana Cirstea 6-4, 6-1.

Sania Mirza and Bob Bryan began their partnership with a convincing straight-set victory over Australian pair of Samantha Stosur and Luke Saville in the mixed doubles first round.

The third seeded Indo-American pair coasted to a 6-2, 6-2 win over the local team. (Reuters)

‘One big lie’ Armstrong says of 7 drug-fueled Tours

0

Los Angeles: Disgraced cycling legend Lance Armstrong’s fierce defence of his record finally collapsed as he admitted that his seven Tour de France titles were fueled by an array of drugs.

“I made my decisions. They’re my mistake,” Armstrong told US talk show host Oprah Winfrey yesterday, in his first interview since he was stripped of his record yellow jersey haul and banned from sport for life.

“And I’m sitting here today to acknowledge that and to say I’m sorry for that,” Armstrong said. “I view this situation as one big lie that I repeated a lot of times.”

“Certainly, I’m a flawed character,” said Armstrong, who was once revered as a cancer survivor who beat the odds to succeed on cycling’s greatest stage, then used his fame to help others fighting the disease.

“It’s just this mythic, perfect story,” he said. “And it wasn’t true.”

Winfrey’s much-anticipated interview opened with a rapid-fire series of “yes” or “no” questions that saw Armstrong admit to using the blood-booster EPO, blood-doping transfusions and testosterone and human growth hormone.

He said he didn’t believe that in his years of competition it was possible to win cycling’s greatest races without performance enhancers.

“All the fault and all the blame here falls on me, but behind that picture and behind that story there’s momentum, momentum,” Armstrong said.

“And whether it’s fans or whether it’s the media…it just gets going and I lost myself in all that,” he said.

In those years, Armstrong said, he didn’t even think of himself as cheating. He didn’t feel he was doing something wrong.

“Scary,” Armstrong said.

He admitted he bullied people who didn’t go along with the “narrative” he constructed, but categorically denied forcing team mates to dope.

Armstrong declined to characterise Italian doctor Michele Ferrari as the mastermind of the doping program on the US Postal Service cycling team.

Armstrong took issue with some points in the damning US Anti-Doping Agency report that lifted a lid on his activities, saying he did not believe that the doping program on the US Postal Service team was the biggest in the history of sport.

He said it couldn’t compare to the state-sponsored doping program in the former East Germany, for example.

He also said he didn’t use banned drugs when he returned from retirement in 2009, and was clean when he raced in the Tour de France in 2009 and 2010 and insisted he didn’t force team mates to be involved in doping.

“We expected guys to be fit, to be strong, to perform,” Armstrong said, acknowledging that while he never issued a directive he could see that team mates might feel pressure to follow his example.

The International Cycling Union last year upheld the US Anti-Doping Agency’s ban of Armstrong, and the revocation of his cycling results from August 1998.

This includes a 2000 Olympic time-trial bronze medal officially yanked by the International Olympic Committee on Thursday.

Since the interview was taped, speculation has swirled as to whether he had implicated others – notably members of the sport’s world governing body – amid allegations of complicity and cover-up.

Armstrong said he thought doping was part of the culture of cycling but added that he didn’t want to accuse others.

“I didn’t invent the culture, but I didn’t try to stop the culture, and that’s my mistake and that’s what I have to be sorry for, and the sport is now paying the price because of that, and so I am sorry for that.”

Reactions to the broadcast came swiftly, with Livestrong, the cancer charity Armstrong founded saying, in a statement, “We at the Livestrong Foundation are disappointed by the news that Lance Armstrong misled people during and after his cycling career, including us.

“Even in the wake of our disappointment, we also express our gratitude to Lance as a survivor for the drive, devotion and spirit he brought to serving cancer patients and the entire cancer community.”

John Fahey, of the World Anti-Doping Agency said, “I thought he was doing it in a very controlled public relations manner, he indicated he was a cheat and that he told lies and attempted to justify it by saying he had to do this to keep up with the rest of them to get back on to the level playing field.

“I thought the whole thing was disingenuous to say the least, not impressed at all with his so-called confession.”

Armstrong received little support from fellow athletes, with Novak Djokovic saying from the Australian Open, “I think it’s a disgrace for the sport to have an athlete like this. He cheated the sport. He cheated many people around the world with his career, with his life story. I think they should take all his titles away because it’s not fair towards any athlete… I think he should suffer for his lies all these years. (AFP)