Editor,
In spite of the expectations of the people for a better future, it seems we are heading for the usual post election scenario. As in the past, it looks like we will again have a coalition government. With the coalition government will come the usual lack of transparency and accountability. This situation benefits politicians who will get authority without responsibility, but it will definitely play havoc on good governance.
The last year, we have seen positive signs from the Mukul Sangma government. Dr Sangma has been doing and saying the right things, thereby positively catching the attention of the common people. Unfortunately, his own Congress party has not invested in his Chief Ministership and has, instead, continued with it’s well honed “divide and rule” policy. If only they had placed their faith on Dr Mukul and allowed him to pick his candidates for the sake of stability and good governance post election! Instead, it is reported that they have asked Messrs Lapang and Pala to take charge of the Khasi and Jaintia Hills sector, while Dr Sangma was asked to look after Garo Hills. This paves the way for a leadership struggle within the Congress, post election, which will lead to instability. The ultimate gainers will be the AICC representatives while the ultimate victims will be good governance and, of course, the people.
There has been a lot of dissatisfaction with the Congress, but unfortunately the other parties have chosen to play second fiddle to the Congress. Instead of reinventing themselves and sacrificing for the people by going in for a pre-poll alliance, they are content with looking to gain only from the mistakes of the Congress. After the election, they will fight with each other to support the Congress and be a part of the coalition. Then, throughout the term there will be no opposition in case the opportunity to be with the government comes their way. At the end of the day, the role of the opposition will have to be again played by pressure groups like the KSU, FKJGP, CSWO, ANVC, etc.
So what can the people do in order to get good governance? I guess they can only look to choose wisely for themselves. Let the people not be fooled by monetary incentives or electoral platitudes. Let them choose people with integrity, who are willing to commit on transparency and accountability, as their representatives. Then hope that the character of the people they have chosen will give them stability and good governance for the next five years. I urge the people of the State to reject all tainted candidates, otherwise the frustration will build up, and we know how that frustration can get expressed.
I sincerely pray that God may bless and protect our State and it’s people.
Yours etc.,
R G Lyngdoh.
Via email
Who do we choose?
Editor,
With elections just round the corner, prospective candidates are already at work. Election campaigns are doing the rounds, false promises are made and the humility to reach even the downtrodden is in full display. As has been practised in the past, money power will again throw its weight. Well, who does not need money? The haves want more while the have-nots always feel its need. Therefore we have contenders who are ready to shed money now to secure a win as they will retrieve it manifold once they are elected. On the other hand the poor who are always left in the lurch and are in need of the means to help at least ease their temporary miseries will accept every token of help. Sometimes, especially in the villages, people are so struck by conscience that they feel obliged to cast their votes for the one who meets their needs, although at times they are aware that the candidate does not really care about them but is only conspiring to prosper himself/herself. Of course there are smart voters too who will not shy away from asking or taking what is being offered to them but will vote for a candidate of their choice. Election is an interesting dice game that the candidates and the voters play with or against one another.
I would like to exhort especially the educated lot to vote wisely and conscientiously. But sadly we tend to suffer from dementia or short memory loss. Come election time and we slip on the false promises that politicians make and forget the scams that come along with the candidate. But can we afford to still make the same mistake and vote for the one who had let us down? Should they be given more chances to commit more malpractices?
Another interesting point emerging from the younger generation baffles me. Slogans like “Exercise your voting rights” “Make the right choice” etc are heard and seen everywhere. But is there really a choice? What do voters choose from when most of the candidates are unfit and unqualified? The young want to exercise their rights (especially first timers) but can they simply vote for anyone who does not meet their expectations? We have educated and conscientious young minds that are aware of what is right and what is wrong so we hope for a better tomorrow. Perhaps the Constitution needs constructive amendments to include educational qualifications and retirement age for candidates so as to discourage any Tom, Dick and Harry loaded with money from simply jumping into the fray. At the risk of sounding cynical one sees a very bleak outcome out of this 2013 election.
Yours etc.,
Jenniefer Dkhar,
Via email