WASHINGTON: Muammar Gaddafi’s camp is courting Islamist rebels to turn against liberals, his son said in an interview, a sign of efforts to exploit divisions within the insurgency after the killing of its military chief.
The New York Times said an Islamist rebel figure named by Gaddafi’s son as his interlocutor had confirmed the contacts but denied he had split with liberals in the rebellion.
Gaddafi cracked down firmly on Islamists during his 41 years in power, and many Islamists have sided with more liberal, pro-Western rebels trying to oust him.
Talk of splits within the Benghazi-based rebellion have escalated since the killing last week of their top military commander, General Abdel Fattah Younes, who was assassinated after having been summoned back from the front line.
Saif al-Islam Gaddafi told the New York Times that he had made contact with Islamists among the rebels. The government and the Islamists would announce an alliance in a joint statement within days, he said.
Saif al-Islam Gaddafi had had ”many discussions” with the opposition, Sallabi said. (UNI)
”The liberals will escape or be killed,” Saif al-Islam, once seen as a reformist and a potential successor to his father, told the newspaper.
”We will do it together … Libya will look like Saudi Arabia, like Iran. So what?” he said. ”I know they are terrorists. They are bloody. They are not nice. But you have to accept them,” he added of the Islamists.
He said he had been in contact with an Islamist rebel figure, Ali Sallabi, describing him as the ”real leader” of the rebellion and the ”spiritual leader” of its Islamists.
The New York Times quoted Sallabi as acknowledging contacts with Saif al-Islam but saying he remained allied with liberals seeking to oust the Gaddafi family from power.
”Liberals are a part of Libya,” the newspaper quoted Sallabi as saying. ”I believe in their right to present their political project and convince the people with it.”
”The first thing discussed is their departure from power.”
The killing of Younes has yet to be fully explained. It exposed tribal rivalries within the rebellion as well as divisions between its Islamist and liberal wings, and raised concerns over whether the rebels would be able to maintain stability if they eventually take power.