FILM: Ram-leela
CAST: Deepika Padukone, Ranveer Singh, Supriya Pathak, Gulshan Devaiah and Richa Chadda;
DIRECTOR: Sanjay Leela Bhansali
Just when you think you have seen it all, there comes a film that reminds you of how far the cinematic medium has come…And how far it can go in the right hands. Let’s face it – Bhansali is Bhansali. The visual imagery in all his earlier films – from Khamoshi: The Musical to Guzaarish is comparable with the best art from any field of aesthetics.
In terms of its free-flowing, unmeasured and operatic opulence, Ram-leela (with or without the censorial prefix), comes closest to the giddy high-pitched and yet miraculously controlled tempo and tenor of Bhansali’s Devdas. That too was a steeply sensuous cinematic adaptation from a literary source.
Ram-leela goes to William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and comes away with a marvel of a tale of love-at-first-sight. Bhansali tilts his hat to mythology, folkore and the culture of community clashes with a blend of spontaneity and brilliance.
What Bhansali does to Shakespeare’s tumultuous saga of sudden love between scions of two warring families, is beyond the imagination of all other living filmmakers of this country.
The rigorous reworking of the Shakespearean classic required a certain sense of recklessness. Earlier this year, we saw some of the same creative recklessness in two other Bollywood adaptations of “Romeo and Juliet” – namely Aanand L. Rai’s “Raanjhanaa” and Manish Tiwary’s Issaq.
But in Ram-leela, every image and frame tells a story.
Bhansali’s Romeo and Juliet are unabashedly sexual in their body and verbal language. None of that traditional coyness and hesitation that characterises traditional courtship when Ram and Leela discuss one another’s vital statistics. He runs a porn video parlour. She comes from a family of gun-wielding criminals helmed by a steely matriarch (Supriya Pathak, brilliant). He comments on her ‘136 inch’ chest, she talks about his, er, trigger. They are in love and they know lust is an integral component of their relationship.
No two lovers derived from a classic romance have celebrated their mutual sexual desires so frankly and fearlessly.
Gosh, these two are Romeo and Juliet on steroids! And this is as good a place as any to tell you that no other two actors could have done to Bhansali’s Romeo/Ram and Juliet/Leela what Ranveer and Deepika have done. They don’t play the two characters. The couple owns their characters.
In his quest for the most visually invigorating shots, Bhansali is here assisted amply by his cinematographer Ravi Varman. Varman uses the camera like Ustad Amjad Ali Khan uses the Sarod. It’s an instrument to converse with divinity. Wasiq Khan’s art work too unfurls a spiralling tapestry of kaleidoscopic colours that find a place in the hectic frames without jostling or crowding the canvas.
Of the innumerable imperishable images that emerge from the film’s tumultuous tale of overnight passion, elopement, estrangement and reunion, I’d single out two. The first shows Barkha Bisht as Ranveer’s widowed sister-in-law running away from a gang of attackers. As she runs through the rugged hinterland, her brass vessel tumbles down-slope with her.
The sequence, caught in a desperately dying light, is probably the most vivid image of impending doom I’ve seen in any recent film.
The other unforgettable image features Deepika, her hand bloodied after an injury, lying on the wet ground in a streak of blood. It reminded me of Aishwarya Rai’s slashed wrist creating a pond of blood with her hand in Bhansali’s Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam. Fire and blood are never far away from Bhansali’s vision. Though there is plenty of bloodied images in “Ram-leela”, the fire this time rages in the eyes of the characters. The film’s visual poetry is so eloquent that you wonder at times if the filmmaker is a closet-painter. A closet-musician, Bhansali certainly is. His self-composed songs assisted by Monty Sharma’s evocative background score, perfectly capture the film’s impetuous mood.
The actors do the rest. Every performer surrenders to the tempestuous saga. While Supriya Pathak leads the supporting cast with a stellar performance, Richa Chadda, Abhimanyu Singh, Gulshan Devaiah and Sharad Kelkar are the portrait of pitch-perfect emoting.
As for the Ranveer-Deepika pair, I finally know what on-screen chemistry means. Their frankly erotic togetherness is comparable with Raj Kapoor and Nargis in Awara. Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram-leela is the most vital romantic musical in the last five years. To experience it is to serenade the divine. To miss it would be a crime. (IANS)
FILM: Insidious: Chapter 2
Cast: Patrick Wilson, Rose Byrne, Ty Simpkins, Lin Shaye, Barbara Hershey, Steve Coulter, Leigh Whannel…
DIRECTOR: James Wan
Insidious: Chapter 2 is a big letdown by the director James Wan, who had previously given us Insidious in 2011 and The Conjuring in July. While the earlier films were well-crafted, this one is a far cry from the earlier ones.
The narration is a compilation of three paranormal-demonic-possession tales before winding up with an unbelievable climax set in the nether world ‘The Further’, where evil spirits lurk. It is the journey of Josh (Patrick Wilson), his older son Dalton (Ty Simpkins), and Parker Crane.
The film takes off from the original Insidious, where hypnotist Elise Rainer (Lin Shaye) informs Mrs. Lambert, who complains of paranormal activities, that, the problem is not the house, but her son Josh.
It’s 1986 at the Lambert Residence. Josh (Patrick Wilson) is now a married man with three kids. It is during their process of rescuing Josh’s elder son Dalton (Ty Simpkins) from the evil forces, they realise that he is gifted with the ability to travel in his sleep to ‘The Further’. Meanwhile, the Lamberts struggle to find what keeps them connected to the fiendish forces.
A good thirty minutes into the film and after a few loud jolt scares involving, closet doors opening on their own, a zipping of a surreal vibration, a wailing baby and a self-playing piano comes the inciting moment in the form of Elise Rainer’s death at the Lambert Residence. She is strangled to death. Josh is the suspect initially, but is cleared soon.
The family is forced to seek help.
With the help of paranormal scrutinising associates: Carl (Steve Coulter), Tucker (Angus Sampson) and Specs (Leigh Whannel) Josh’s agonised mother, an ex-hospital employee, Lorraine (Barbara Hershey), helps them track down an old man Parker Crane (Tom Fitzpatrick) who they believe is linked to their problem.
So, after rummaging hospital records and scavenging Parker’s home, they zero on to the demonic creature that has taken possession of Josh’s body to accomplish its evil deeds.
The characters seem routine. Patrick as Josh with his vacant and blank expressionless face looks possessed, when he is not supposed to be. Rose Bryne as his paranoid wife and Barbara Hershey as Josh’s concerned mother are unconvincing. Lin Shaye looks too dignified to be a ghost hunter. Whannel and Angus as the eager beaver ghostbusters, are supposed to offer comic-relief but in fact ridicule themselves.
While the premise of this horror film may sound novel and exciting, the problem that plagues “Insidious: Chapter 2” is that the director has used all cliche tricks with flashlights and shaky cameras that make up the horror genre. Over a period of time, the scares seem generic, synthetic and staid.
The screenplay reeks of mediocre events. If horror is your favourite genre, then you are bound to be disappointed with Insidious: Chapter 2. (IANS)