New Delhi: As Congress won the Uttarakhand confidence motion, its party members in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday resisted the move to present the state’s budget Bill by the government which insisted that it was a Constitutional necessity.
The Congress members also vociferously pressed for a discussion on CAG report which has reportedly highlighted irregularities in Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation’s KG basin gas project, leading to two adjournments.
As the Upper House met after lunch recess by when the outcome of Uttarakhand confidence motion was clear, Congress members were up on their feet shouting slogans against the central government. “Loktantra ke hatyaro, sharm karo (Feel ashamed, you murderers of democracy),” they chanted.
Amidst the din, Deputy Chairman P J Kurien tried to initiate discussion on Union Finance Bill but Congress leader Anand Sharma raised questions over the move to bring the Uttarakhand budget bill in the Supplementary list. Contending that the state assembly had already passed its budget, he said passing the Uttrakhand budget is not the responsibility of this House” and termed it a “Constitutional impropriety.”
Slamming the “mental and moral bankruptcy of the government”, Sharma also asked why the Uttarakhand budget bill had been brought in the Supplemntary list.
Leader of House and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley responded by saying that the passing of the state budget on March 18 was “highly contentious” as the arithematic was highly loaded against it.
He emphasised that the order of appropriation has to be sanctioned by Parliament as all expenditure from April 1 has to be validated.
The Finance Minister said if the state assembly revives, it can pass its budget but insisted that the bill has to be passed to provide sanction to all expenditure made since April 1, when the President’s Rule was in force. This, he said, has nothing to do with what happened in the floor test in the state assembly on Tuesday. However, Sharma and other Congress members appeared not convinced by the argument. Jaitley also mentioned that the state budget had not received the assent of the Governor which is a necessity. Kurien said he too was in agreement that the House should pass the Bill to sanction the expenditure during President’s Rule. (PTI)
