Friday, May 3, 2024
spot_img

‘Edu Scam’: HLSC report gathers dust

Date:

Share post:

spot_img
spot_img

SHILLONG: Two years after their services were terminated following the ‘Education Scam’, the affected LP school teachers are yet to know the content of the report of the High Level Scrutiny Committee based on which the government had acted against the ‘tainted’ teachers.
Though many RTI applications were filed by the affected teachers and others, the Education department is yet to make the report public.
It was on February 28, 2014 that the Education department had terminated the services of as many as 246 ‘tainted’ teachers following the recommendations of High Level Scrutiny Committee which probed the ‘Education Scam’.
The task of the Committee was to segregate the ‘tainted and non tainted teachers’.
After the CBI unearthed anomalies in the teachers’ recruitment scam, the State government had insisted on the formation of the High Level Scrutiny Committee which finally got the nod of the then Shillong Bench of the Gauhati High Court.
Though the Supreme Court through an interim order on April 2, 2014 had made the formation of the Scrutiny Committee non-operational by staying the order of the Shillong Bench of the Gauhati High Court which facilitated the formation of the Scrutiny Committee, the State government has not revoked the termination.
However, the special leave petition filed by 40 ‘tainted’ teachers in Khasi Hills is still pending with the Supreme Court.
What shocked the teachers whose services were terminated is that the Education department had cited that they had a role “in getting their appointments through unfair means”.
However, the 107-page CBI report said, “It was felt necessary to examine J.D. Sangma, the then Director DEME. In course of his examination by the CBI, Sangma has stated that under the instruction of the then Minister of Education – Ampareen Lyngdoh – he had to change the score sheets as prepared by all the five boards duly applying white fluid on the original marks, as awarded by the members of the Board”.
Sangma had also reiterated the same in the lower court under section 164 CrPC during the initial investigation of the police.

Previous article
Next article
spot_img
spot_img

Related articles

De Villiers slams pundits for criticising Kohli

New Delhi, May 2: Former South Africa great AB de Villiers has slammed the “data-driven” cricket pundits for...

Dortmund pip PSG 1-0 in first leg

Dortmund, May 2: Niclas Füllkrug scored and Borussia Dortmund earned a 1-0 win over Paris Saint-Germain in the...

Gari su·galgipa centre-rangko antio salgni kulichina ge·eta

TURA: Tura jillani pilak gittimrangon chirangko chu·onga gita man·jaengani a·sel neng·nikanirangko chagrongna nangtokengani gimin Tura Municipality area-ni ning·o...

Tunes of caged bird

Truth is one thing, and arguments before courts are quite another. Arguments often have the capacity to turn...