Monday, May 12, 2025
spot_img

Drama in courtroom as lawyer tears map

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

New Delhi: The Supreme Court Wednesday saw senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan tearing up the pictorial map provided by a Hindu party purportedly showing the exact birthplace of Lord Ram on the concluding day of the marathon hearing in the politically sensitive case of Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya.
Dhavan, representing Sunni Wakf Board and other Muslim parties, took strong objection to senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for a faction of All India Hindu Mahasabha (AIHM), relying on the site map and books written by foreign and Indian authors to buttress claims that the central dome of the demolished structure was the birthplace of ‘Ram Lalla’.
Dhavan said such documents (maps) cannot be relied upon in the matter now as the issue of location of ‘janmsthan’ was discussed by the Allahabad High Court on other documents.
When he vigorously raised objections to the reliance on the pictorial map, which is also part of the book Ayodhya Revisited by a former Bihar cadre IPS officer, Singh said that he will not press the pictorial map to be taken on record.
Dhavan then asked the 5-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi as to what he should do with it (map). The bench said that he can shred the documents into pieces.
Dhavan then tore the pictorial map, provided by the AIHM counsel, in the courtroom to the utter shock of the lawyers and visitors in the packed courtroom.
The drama did not end there and during the hearing in the post lunch session, Dhavan again referred to the pre-lunch incident of his tearing off the papers and said that “outside the court, it has become viral”.
Dhavan said he had asked and sought the permission of the bench whether those papers can be thrown and the reply from the CJI was “if it is irrelevant, you can tear it”.
“The CJI said I could shred the papers and I just followed the order. I take advice of Mr (Arvind) Datar in such matters and he told me it was a mandamus (a kind of writ or direction),” Dhavan said.
The CJI shot back saying, “Dr Dhavan is right that the chief justice said, so he tore up. Let this clarification also be widely reported.” (PTI)

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

VPP questions need for all-party panel on railway projects

SHILLONG, May 11: The Voice of the People Party (VPP) has justified its decision to opt out of...

Dhar trashes HNLC claims as baseless

SHILLONG, May 11: Deputy Chief Minister Sniawbhalang Dhar on Sunday dismissed as “false and baseless” the claims of...

Conrad urges Edn min to allot CUET centres within state

SHILLONG, May 11: Chief Minister Conrad K Sangma has urged Union Minister of Education, Dharmendra Pradhan, to direct...

NEHU speaks out against dual affiliation for colleges

Shillong, May 11: The North-Eastern Hill University (NEHU) has clarified that its Act does not allow any college...