Tuesday, August 19, 2025
spot_img

Assam tribunal dismisses land-owner’s appeal against RERA order

Date:

Share post:

spot_imgspot_img

Guwahati, Sept 19: The Assam Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (REAT) has dismissed an appeal filed by a land-owner against a judgment delivered by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), Assam.

Making the observation, Assam REAT pointed out that Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act “makes it amply clear that a person who can file a complaint before the RERA must be a person who is aggrieved on account of any violation or contravention of the provisions of the Act or Rules or Regulations made there-under.”

“Only a person who is aggrieved on account of violation or contravention of any provision of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act or rules or regulations made there-under can file a complaint before the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA),” the tribunal (REAT) observed while dismissing the appeal filed by the land-owner.

In the instant case, the RERA, Assam had refused to entertain a complaint filed by the land-owner against the builder of a project, developed on her piece of land on the ground that it was beyond the ambit of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Aggrieved by the order of the RERA, the land-owner filed an appeal with the Assam REAT.

In the present case, the complainant herself was the co-owner and co-promoter of the project and, in fact, the building permission issued by the GMDA itself stood in her name.

The landowner and the builder had signed a deed of MoU (memorandum of understanding) whereby the builder had agreed to develop and construct an RCC building on the land owned by the complainant.

“The dispute and differences between the land owner on one hand and the builder on the other, centred around alleged contravention of the deed of MoU with regard to the project, which had been developed and executed on sharing basis between the two parties without any financial obligation.

“The dispute and differences did not emanate from any agreement for sale drawn in terms of the spirit of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. Hence, the appeal was dismissed,” the order passed by Justice (retired) Manojit Bhuyan, chairperson, Assam REAT, and Onkar Kedia, member, Assam REAT, read.

spot_imgspot_img

Related articles

Former NCPCR chief raises alarm over court ruling on marriage of minor Muslim girl

New Delhi, Aug 19: Priyank Kanoongo, the former chairperson of National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR)...

ISRO to launch 75-tonne satellite on a 40-storey tall rocket: Chairman

New Delhi, Aug 19:  The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) is planning to launch a 75-tonne satellite on...

Trump dials Putin, discusses holding trilateral meeting with Zelensky: Kremlin

Moscow, Aug 19: Russian President Vladimir Putin and his American counterpart Donald Trump on Tuesday held a telephonic...

Saradha chit fund owner Sudipta Sen, director Debjani Mukherjee acquitted in 3 cases

Kolkata, Aug 19: Saradha chit fund company owner Sudipta Sen and a director in the Saradha Group, Debjani...