Friday, April 18, 2025

If Prez can be criticised, why not judges: Kovind in RS

Date:

Share post:

New Delhi:  Ram Nath Kovind believes that if the president of the country can be criticised, there is no reason why members of the judiciary cannot be pulled up.
The BJP’s presidential candidate had said in a debate in Parliament that “if the appointing authority” of judges, that is the president, could be censured, so could the judiciary. “If any citizen of this country can criticise the President of India for his wrong-doing, I don’t think it could be valid … if the judiciary is exempted,” Kovind said as a Rajya Sabha member in the debate on March 3, 2006, on the contempt of courts (Amendment) Bill, 2006, moved by then Law Minister Hansraj Bhardwaj.
He, however, added, the judiciary had been exempted “to maintain its independence”. Kovind, who was a Rajya Sabha member from Uttar Pradesh and a former lawyer, spoke at length on the Bill that sought to reform contempt laws. “Every citizen has got a fundamental right to speak the truth. If he wants to say anything on the matter of inefficiency or corruption, he is most welcome,” he said.
He also mentioned that the then Chief Justice of India had referred to corruption in the judiciary. “It is not only the citizen. We know that once even the Chief Justice of India had said — he did admit – that some percentage of the judiciary was corrupt. Of course, he can’t be hauled up for contempt of court because he happens to be from the same community (of the judiciary),” Kovind said. Emphasising that ordinary citizens must have the right to react, he said the person’s response “could be for wrong- doing or his reaction could be for rectifying them, whatsoever it may be”.
The NDA’s nominee, who is likely to be elected president next month, had also congratulated the law minister of the then Congress-led UPA government for the amendment on contempt of court. Kovind cited a few examples in his speech to argue that courts had wide “discretionary powers” and that there was “an element of non-accountability” in the judiciary. “This is rather adversely affecting our judicial system and the deliverance of administration by the system,” he said. (PTI)

Related articles

RCB batters look to rise above PBKS’ spin challenge

Bengaluru, April 17: Royal Challengers Bengaluru’s push for a maiden home victory this season will depend on their...

Axar terms McGurk as game changer

New Delhi, April 17: Delhi Capitals skipper Axar Patel conceded that his team has struggled with shaky starts...

Comedian Nate Bargatze to host 77th Emmy Awards

Comedian Nate Bargatze has been chosen to host the 77th Emmy Awards, which will air live on CBS...

Chinnaswamy not a batting paradise anymore: Bhuvneshwar

Bengaluru, April 17: Royal Challengers Bengaluru’s pacer Bhuvneshwar Kumar believes the M Chinnaswamy Stadium is no longer playing...